Slant *        6        Forum
Home Home Home
The Place to Go for Slant Six Info!
Click here to help support the Slant Six Forum!
It is currently Thu Apr 18, 2024 11:09 am

All times are UTC-07:00




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 19 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Shaving?
PostPosted: Fri Mar 04, 2016 6:46 am 
Offline
Turbo EFI
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2015 5:55 am
Posts: 1387
Location: Brightwood, VA
Car Model: 1965 Plymouth Belvedere I
I was curious. Let's say you were going to shave the deck or head to increase the compression. Is it better to shave the head or the deck, or does it really matter which? On the engine I am currently building, I had a head that was shaved but I had the block decked while it was at the machine shop to get my target compression. So, I have done both on this engine. I am planning on a backup engine (in case I blow this one up) and was just wondering if it made any difference which part was machined, as long as the target compression number is achieved.

_________________
-MattMan
LEANED & MEAN
Image


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 04, 2016 7:04 am 
Offline
Turbo Slant 6
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2014 8:25 am
Posts: 790
Location: Springtucky OR
Car Model:
If you are removing a lot of material (more than 0.100") it's probably smart to split between the two. That way you avoid the risk of thin spots.

_________________
--> Check out my FI Turbo build <--
--> And the race truck build project <--
--> The Diesel Corvette <--
Image


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 04, 2016 7:10 am 
Offline
Turbo EFI
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 1:11 am
Posts: 1473
Location: North Georgia
Car Model:
I agree. There's a lot of metal in the deck, but I don't think it wise to just start hacking away. The thickness across the top of the deck and bottom of the head is not uniform; the thickness varies due to production tolerances from one engine to the next. I like the idea of splitting the difference between the two surfaces, but have the machine shop verify the thickness first.

I've only ever had it done once, and that was because of a warped head causing chronic head gasket failure. They took off 0.20" which is not a whole lot.

_________________
If it was easy, everybody would be doing it.
Image


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 04, 2016 7:44 am 
Offline
Board Sponsor & SL6 Racer
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2002 4:48 pm
Posts: 5835
Location: Burton BC canada
Car Model:
I like to take more off the block deck.

Id surface the head for seal and straightness.......do all your chamber and valve work....then measure to see how much decking is needed for target CR

Reshaping the combustion chamber for larger valves adds volume. Bore notching for flow around larger valves is sketchy. Taking a lot off the head puts the valves closer to the deck.

If all the head work is focussed on flow and flame spread .....it makes some sense to use block decking to achieve the desired compression.

You can easily deck the block .100

_________________
Yeah....Im the one who destroyed this rare, vintage automobile.....

Image


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 04, 2016 7:54 am 
Offline
Turbo EFI
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2015 5:55 am
Posts: 1387
Location: Brightwood, VA
Car Model: 1965 Plymouth Belvedere I
I cc'd the head on my current engine and based the amount to be decked off of that. Basically, I have .060 off the head and .070 off the block. I was just curious about this when I get the spare engine machined.

_________________
-MattMan
LEANED & MEAN
Image


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 04, 2016 10:51 am 
Offline
Board Sponsor & Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2002 7:27 pm
Posts: 14151
Location: Park Forest, Illinoisy
Car Model: 68 Valiant
I would machine the block and head to the same specs as your present engine. Then you can mix and match parts in emergencies without changing your CR.

_________________
Official Cookie and Mater Tormentor.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 04, 2016 11:19 am 
Offline
Turbo EFI
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2015 5:55 am
Posts: 1387
Location: Brightwood, VA
Car Model: 1965 Plymouth Belvedere I
The backup engine is supposed to be from a 73 Duster. I will know when I look at it tomorrow. Guess I'll measure the deck height and then shave the block to get the came CR with my current head (45cc chambers on it).

_________________
-MattMan
LEANED & MEAN
Image


Top
   
 Post subject: I would...
PostPosted: Fri Mar 04, 2016 5:50 pm 
Offline
Board Sponsor
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2002 8:27 pm
Posts: 9760
Location: Salem, OR
Car Model:
I always run my calcs, and take a fair amount of the cut off the block first... that way you can assemble the bottom end and check the numbers.

Then you can make your adjustments with the cut on the head (and it also gives the machine shop time to install your OS valves which can change the volume of the chamber depending on how they seat (and if you installed new seats)... so you can measure that then use the .0066=1cc rule to make your final adjustment (as long as the chamber is under 40cc)...

As posted, taking the cut on both surfaces will get you a true surface (well...somewhat true I've had a couple that were .001 with a machinists edge and tape in some spots... :roll:

.130 isn't bad, you'll need new pushrods, and you will have to check to see if the headbolts will still work... (on my 10.3:1 motor with a similar set of cuts I was just beyond the point where headbolts would even clamp), a set of ARP Studs will take care of that (I have had good success with them from 10:1-12:1...on the 12:1 motor I had to take over .2 combined between the head and the block...machinists who have never done a slant really love doing that...)


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 05, 2016 4:33 am 
Offline
Board Sponsor & Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2002 11:08 am
Posts: 16505
Location: Blacksburg, VA
Car Model:
I am always swapping parts around on different engines, so I take most of the cut off the head so I can easily adjust CR and performance by swapping a head and leave the engine in the car. Once you cut the block a bunch, you cannot go down in CR without building a whole new bottom end.

Any combo works, though! 0.100" off each head and block is completely safe, and I would say 0.150" off each is almost certainly safe. I have heard for 0.200" off one or the other. Max I have done is 0.110" off the manifold side and 0.210" off the plug side.

Lou

_________________
Home of Slant6-powered fun machines


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 05, 2016 5:15 am 
Offline
Turbo EFI
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2015 5:55 am
Posts: 1387
Location: Brightwood, VA
Car Model: 1965 Plymouth Belvedere I
Dart270 wrote:
Max I have done is 0.110" off the manifold side and 0.210" off the plug side.


You lost me there, Lou.

_________________
-MattMan
LEANED & MEAN
Image


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 05, 2016 5:24 am 
Offline
Board Sponsor & Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2002 11:08 am
Posts: 16505
Location: Blacksburg, VA
Car Model:
You can "angle mill" the head. This closes up the chamber a bit more on the plug side of the head and leaves more meat on the manifold side. Slightly tilts the head ports up. I do not think this is worth much in terms of performance, but who knows. Meril Bruner told me this trick in 1991 when I visited him in TN and I did it on a couple of heads. Lately I have done more with taller pistons and less head milling. IMHO, net compression ratio and head flow will have a much bigger influence than any tweaking in where you mill, angles, etc... Make sure you put at least the 1.70/1.44 valves in your head and do some bowl porting - biggest gains are there (along with at least 8.5-9:1 of true static comp).

Lou

_________________
Home of Slant6-powered fun machines


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 05, 2016 5:37 am 
Offline
Turbo EFI
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2015 5:55 am
Posts: 1387
Location: Brightwood, VA
Car Model: 1965 Plymouth Belvedere I
I thought you were talking about angle milling the head. I had thought of this but didn't think it would affect much other than the shape of the combustion chamber. That would be more variables than I care to work with for now. I don't want to reinvent the wheel here, just pump it up a little (ok, a lot).

_________________
-MattMan
LEANED & MEAN
Image


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 05, 2016 7:57 am 
Offline
Board Sponsor & Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2002 11:08 am
Posts: 16505
Location: Blacksburg, VA
Car Model:
Yes, angle milling the head. That is exactly what I was talking about.

Lou

_________________
Home of Slant6-powered fun machines


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 05, 2016 9:45 am 
Offline
Board Sponsor
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2003 2:37 pm
Posts: 4194
Location: CA
Car Model:
Wouldn't angle milling the head cause the head bolts to not come in flush contact with the head? You'd need wedge shaped washers, or mill the top of the bolt holes at the same new angle.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 05, 2016 10:12 am 
Offline
Board Sponsor & SL6 Racer

Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 7:57 pm
Posts: 8322
Location: Waynesboro, Pa.
Car Model: 65 Valiant 2Dr Post
I am not sure what others have done, but when I spoke to the engine builder that I am using, they do kiss the top of each head bolt face to straighten it up with the new face angle.

Rick

_________________
2 Mopars come with Spark plug tubes. One is a world class, racing machine. The other is a 426 CI. boat anchor!
Image
12.70 @ 104.6
Image


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 19 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 Next

All times are UTC-07:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 45 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited