Slant *        6        Forum
Home Home Home
The Place to Go for Slant Six Info!
Click here to help support the Slant Six Forum!
It is currently Sun Jun 26, 2022 11:04 pm

All times are UTC-07:00




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Mar 22, 2009 6:20 pm 
Offline
Supercharged
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 1:25 pm
Posts: 5516
Location: Downeast Maine
Car Model:
A nerd question coming up, get some coffee & eye drops... Perhaps the Doc has performed a few dino test pulls examining this same scenario.

Josh:

Quote:
[url=http://www.slantsix.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=230830&highlight=#230830photos & text[/url] showing manifold plenum divider, and Clifford intake.


I performed a few calculations to illustrate the percent difference in runner length when a 4 bl carburetor is mounted with primaries facing forward. The results listed # 1 to # 6 cylinder using nominal lengths in inches including roughly 5" of head passage to the valve seat. The center of the primaries are located approximately 1" ahead of the manifold center line making each runner different length:
# 1=18"---90%
# 2=13"---65%
# 3=11"---55%
# 4=12"---60%
# 5=15"---75%
# 6=20"---100%
Total runner length=89" / 6=14.8"

This set up yields runner lengths varying up to 45%. This has to change the torque output of each cylinder, but how much? I know that longer the runners, produce higher torque hence the Hyper Pack manifold which has close to equal runner length for all cylinders.

If one were to turn the carburetor 90 degrees locating the primaries to the left side (west) placing them the greatest distance from the valve seat, and dividing the manifold so that cylinders 1, 2, & 3 run on half the carburetor with one primary & one secondary feeding then, and the same for 4, 5, & 6, the percent difference between runner lengths diminishes to the following:

# 1=18"---100%
# 2=14"---77%
# 3=13"---72%
# 4=13"---72%
# 5=14"---77%
# 6=18"---100%
Total runner length=90" / 6=15.0"

This set up yields runner lengths varying 28%, a 17% reduction from the first illustration.

Dose this reduction in percent difference in runner length make for a smother performing engine producing higher torque? My gut is telling me the second set up is the better of the two. But, how much better?

_________________
67' Dart GT Convertible; the old Chrysler Corp.
82' LeBaron Convertible; the new Chrysler Corp
07' 300 C AWD; Now by Fiat, the old new Chrysler LLC

Image


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 

All times are UTC-07:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited