Slant *        6        Forum
Home Home Home
The Place to Go for Slant Six Info!
Click here to help support the Slant Six Forum!
It is currently Sun Jan 12, 2025 11:43 pm

All times are UTC-08:00




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 Next
Author Message
 Post subject: 10% Ethenol problem
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2006 4:35 pm 
Offline
Contributor
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 9:29 am
Posts: 1046
Location: Texas
Car Model: 1964 Valiant convertible 225 automatic
A few months ago, Texas began using 10% Ethenol gasoline to meet EPA regulations. Neither my slant '64 Valiant or my '73, 318 truck like the crap and both exhibit hard starting. It makes no difference if the engine is hot or cold, they both take more cranking to get them to fire. The slant has had a recent complete tune-up, with a new Mopar distributor and coil and the BBD was rebuilt a year ago. The 318 has a few hundred miles on a total rebuild and is running a nearly new Edelbrock, so neither engine is in need of a tune.

Before the gas formula change, both would start on the first spin of the starter when warm, and within a couple of turns when cold, but now both have to crank 5 seconds or more.

Has anyone noticed similar starting problems for the new fuel blends and if so, have you found a cure?


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2006 7:23 pm 
Offline
Board Sponsor & Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2002 7:27 pm
Posts: 14545
Location: Park Forest, Illinoisy
Car Model: 68 Valiant
I've never noticed starting problems, but I do know that my Dakota will not get as good of gas mileage on the blended crap. :shock:

_________________
Official Cookie and Mater Tormentor.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2006 7:35 pm 
Offline
Supercharged
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2005 8:32 pm
Posts: 7834
Location: Portland-ish
Car Model: Fiat 500e
Do the vehicles run well when they are running? Is hard starting the only problem? How is the weather? The Reid Vapor Pressure of ethanol blended gas is higher and can cause vapor lock and/or percolation problems. Also, ethanol is a pretty good solvent and can clean gunk out of the tanks and lines so don't assume your fuel filter and carbs are still clean.

_________________
Joshua


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2006 8:14 pm 
Offline
Board Sponsor & Contributor

Joined: Thu Oct 31, 2002 5:39 pm
Posts: 24486
Location: North America
Car Model:
I lived in Colorado when the Denver-metro area became the first in the US to start using oxygenated gasoline. You are right on the money—the stuff causes starting and driveability problems in our older cars, which are just not on the radar when fuels are being formulated. You will have to adapt, one good way is to do the Fuel line mod.

It is a very good idea to go through and make sure all the flexible fuel hose in your system is the fuel injection type (stamped "30R9") rather than the old 30R7 variety. And, make certain you are using a fuel filter with a metal can, not a plastic one.

_________________
一期一会
Too many people who were born on third base actually believe they've hit a triple.

Image


Top
   
 Post subject: 10 % ethanol gas
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2006 10:48 pm 
Offline
TBI Slant 6

Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2003 5:37 pm
Posts: 105
Location: honolulu, hawaii
Car Model:
When they switched to 10 % ethanol gas over here in Honolulu,
the first 5 gallons i put was Tesoro and the car ran rough and
hard starting. later filled up with Chevron and no problems.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 08, 2006 4:21 am 
Offline
Contributor
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 9:29 am
Posts: 1046
Location: Texas
Car Model: 1964 Valiant convertible 225 automatic
It's not contamination in the fuel. Both have new metal filters and the truck has a plastic tank that I thoroughly cleaned when it was totally restored. That was my first thought, but I cut open the old filter from the Valiant and it contained no sediment of any kind. It was remarkably clean. The only rubber lines the truck has are the short ones attaching the pickup line to the tank and the in-line filter and those are new.

I've also tried 3 different brands of gas, but didn't notice a difference. neither engine idles as smoothly as they did before the fuel changeover, but that's not a real problem. The truck has a lean surge at cruise that's been there since the rebuild, so I can't blame the fuel for that. It's the long cranking time that irritates me.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 08, 2006 9:25 am 
Offline
Supercharged
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 5:09 pm
Posts: 2946
Location: Gilbert, Arizona
Car Model: 1962 Plymouth Valiant Signet
I may be mistaken, but it's my understanding that the carb needs to be setup a little richer for ethanol. 10% doesn't seem like much, but it might be enough that you need to rejet the carb. You probably need to fiddle with the timing as well.

_________________
David Kight
'62 Valiant Signet, White
'98 Dodge Dakota
'06 Jeep Liberty

Growing older is unavoidable but growing up is strictly optional.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 08, 2006 11:46 am 
Offline
Supercharged

Joined: Thu May 12, 2005 11:50 pm
Posts: 6291
Location: So California
Car Model: 64 Plymouth Valiant
Quote:
I may be mistaken, but it's my understanding that the carb needs to be setup a little richer for ethanol. 10% doesn't seem like much, but it might be enough that you need to rejet the carb. You probably need to fiddle with the timing as well.

4% richer to compensate. (1 jet)

_________________
Ed
64 Valiant 225 / 904 / 42:1 manual steering / 9" drum brakes

8)


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: 10% Ethenol problem
PostPosted: Wed Nov 08, 2006 1:38 pm 
Offline
Turbo Slant 6
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2005 12:22 pm
Posts: 580
Location: Austin Texas
Car Model:
Quote:
A few months ago, Texas began using 10% Ethenol gasoline to meet EPA regulations.
Has anyone noticed similar starting problems for the new fuel blends and if so, have you found a cure?
What part of Texas? I haven't seen any notification around here (Austin) that there's been a switch. I haven't noticed any change in the behavior of either of my 440s, but they both use premium fuel which has had more additives like ethanol or MTBE for a while anyway.

_________________
Image


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 08, 2006 2:32 pm 
Offline
Turbo EFI
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 18, 2003 7:34 am
Posts: 2479
Location: Lubbock, Texas
Car Model: 1964 Plymouth Valiant V200 Sedan
Mine cranks a little longer before starting than it did earlier this year, but I think it's mostly the cooler weather. That, and my choke is shot.

_________________
"When you find a big kettle of crazy, it's best not to stir it." - Pointy-haired Boss

1964 Valiant V200, 225/Pushbutton 904
BBD, CAI, HEI, LBP, AC, AM/FM/USB, EIEIO


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: 10% Ethenol problem
PostPosted: Wed Nov 08, 2006 3:20 pm 
Offline
Contributor
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 9:29 am
Posts: 1046
Location: Texas
Car Model: 1964 Valiant convertible 225 automatic
Quote:
What part of Texas? I haven't seen any notification around here (Austin) that there's been a switch. I haven't noticed any change in the behavior of either of my 440s, but they both use premium fuel which has had more additives like ethanol or MTBE for a while anyway.
It's been several months since they switched in the DFW area and East Texas. MTBE is now illegal. All the pumps around here have a sticker that says their fuel contains up to 10% Ethanol, and from the stink, it seems like a lot more. I almost gag while sitting in traffic with all the cars around me smelling so bad. Even my garage stinks for an hour or more after I park inside and close the doors. I can't imagine how bad it would be with E85!


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 08, 2006 7:39 pm 
Offline
EFI Slant 6
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 4:47 pm
Posts: 374
Location: SF CAL
Car Model:
Isn't it funny how they put new stuff in to gas for some reason or another and all the sudden it causes a hole bunch of problems and they have to take it out. that MTBE was nasty stuff. 2 months after it was introduced in California it tore through every old fuel line in my 71 240Z.. 5 rubber lines in all. I'm not saying they didn't need to be changed anyway, but I dont think I would have had a problem if that wasn't in my tank.

_________________
64' Valiant Signet 5.9, 64' Dart 170 moredoor 3.7, 67' A100 3.7, 00' Dakota SLT 4.7
Image


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: 10% Ethenol problem
PostPosted: Wed Nov 08, 2006 10:16 pm 
Offline
Turbo Slant 6
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 8:33 pm
Posts: 745
Location: Rolla, MO
Car Model:
Quote:
I can't imagine how bad it would be with E85!
E-85 has a distinctly different smell, but I'm not sure I'd call it obnoxious. I was around a four cylinder Yamaha motorcycle engine that had been converted to run on E85 and I got used to it pretty quickly.

_________________
Used to own:
'82 Dodge D150
Erson 270 Cam, O/S valves, mild port work, ~9.5:1 compression

Currently fighting with an '85 VW Cabriolet

My other passion


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: 10% Ethenol problem
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2006 1:00 am 
Offline
Supercharged
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2005 8:32 pm
Posts: 7834
Location: Portland-ish
Car Model: Fiat 500e
Quote:
It's been several months since they switched in the DFW area and East Texas. MTBE is now illegal. All the pumps around here have a sticker that says their fuel contains up to 10% Ethanol, and from the stink, it seems like a lot more. I almost gag while sitting in traffic with all the cars around me smelling so bad. Even my garage stinks for an hour or more after I park inside and close the doors. I can't imagine how bad it would be with E85!
Imagine how much better your garage would smell if your '64 had an evaporative emissions system. Where I live we've had vapor recovery filler nozzles for years. I rarely smell fuel when putting gas in my wife's Intrepid or my Dakota. Cars that run right won't stink up the place either. My 4 banger Dakota runs a bit rich on dead cold starts so I sometimes get a whiff of gas then, but that's about it. Even my lawnmower runs quite clean. It's got an OHV Subaru Robin engine that's 5X better than any Briggs and Stratton engine I've owned. My 1950s Wisconsin powered 1kW generator is another story.

_________________
Joshua


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: 10% Ethenol problem
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2006 5:10 am 
Offline
Contributor
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 9:29 am
Posts: 1046
Location: Texas
Car Model: 1964 Valiant convertible 225 automatic
Quote:
Imagine how much better your garage would smell if your '64 had an evaporative emissions system. Where I live we've had vapor recovery filler nozzles for years. I rarely smell fuel when putting gas in my wife's Intrepid or my Dakota. Cars that run right won't stink up the place either.
Even the new ones aren't perfect. My wife's 2005 Chrysler 300 stinks too, but to a lesser degree than the Valiant. Like with most perfumes, I have a very low tolerance for the smell of alcohol in any form.

As much as I dislike it, I'll take the smell of the Valiant over that overpriced, overly-complicated, boring tool she calls a car.

FWIW, I lived where you live for over 30 years and remember when the early vapor recovery fillers came in. They were a real pain to operate. Some of the stations around here have them now, but you don't have to be a body builder to make them work.


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 Next

All times are UTC-08:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 7 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited