Slant *        6        Forum
Home Home Home
The Place to Go for Slant Six Info!
Click here to help support the Slant Six Forum!
It is currently Sat Jan 11, 2025 5:54 am

All times are UTC-08:00




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 12:21 am 
Offline
Turbo EFI
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 4:33 pm
Posts: 1004
Location: Sacramento, CA
Car Model:
Ok im pretty much a novice when it comes to working on slants, so I might need a little extra information here. My engine recently got rebuilt. Before the rebuild I was getting 10mpg and my tail pipe was shooting out this black carbon crap and smoking brown and blue smoke when I would nail the throttle. So now the engine is rebuilt and im still only getting 12mpg with the carbon and smoking (just not smoking nearly as bad). The mechanic's at the place that rebuilt my engine told me that the carb is running extremely rich and is at 10% C/O. They said it needs to be down to 2% but it can't be done just by adjusting the screws. They also told me that I need smaller jets. So before having to take it back to them and paying even more, I figured I would mess with it myself so I can learn how to work on this darn thing and maybe save some money.

So now I have a carb kit and a guy who is decent with carb's that is gonna help me rebuild it next week. I was just wondering if anyone had any tips that the instructions don't mention when it comes to rebuilding the Holley 1920? Also what size jets should I get? Im much more concerned with fuel economy rather than performance. Any tips would be appreciated. Thanks.


Top
   
 Post subject: What year?
PostPosted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 8:37 am 
Offline
Board Sponsor
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2002 8:27 pm
Posts: 9714
Location: Salem, OR
Car Model:
Quote:
Also what size jets should I get? Im much more concerned with fuel economy rather than performance.

The year of the carb "kind of" determines the jet size, the old 60's carbs came with everything from 55's to 57's.....56/57 should be fine, 55 is a bit lean in every instance, 58 is the max size for the 1920.

You should get it opened up and see what jet you have, if it's a 56 and they said it's too rich, either they don't know what they are doing or your carb has another problem...


-D.idiot


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: What year?
PostPosted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 8:43 am 
Offline
TBI Slant 6

Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2006 6:42 pm
Posts: 129
Car Model:
Quote:
Quote:
Also what size jets should I get? Im much more concerned with fuel economy rather than performance.

The year of the carb "kind of" determines the jet size, the old 60's carbs came with everything from 55's to 57's.....56/57 should be fine, 55 is a bit lean in every instance, 58 is the max size for the 1920.

You should get it opened up and see what jet you have, if it's a 56 and they said it's too rich, either they don't know what they are doing or your carb has another problem...


-D.idiot
I agree. If that Holley is the original carb (I have a 1920 on my '70 Duster w/225), then those jets should be spot on, unless someone has changed them over the years. Sounds to me more like your float is old, and taking on fuel (heavy). It's an easy carb to work on. Take 'er apart and see what's up!

_________________
DynoDave
1970 Plymouth Duster
1972 Dodge Charger Rallye
1977 Chrysler Cordoba
WPC # 12304
Image


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 10:11 am 
Offline
Turbo EFI
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 4:33 pm
Posts: 1004
Location: Sacramento, CA
Car Model:
Its one of those remanufactured jobs from Kragen :(

I didnt know they were garbage when I bought it a couple years ago.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 11:36 am 
Offline
Guru
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2002 11:22 am
Posts: 3740
Location: Sonoma, Calif.
Car Model: Many Darts and a Dacuda
Low cost carb "remanufacturers" are known to drill-out the factory jet(s) and set the carb way rich, this covers-up other problems the unit may have.
Bottomline, you can't trust the number stamped on the jet, it may have been drilled-out.
DD


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 7:11 pm 
Offline
Turbo EFI
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 4:33 pm
Posts: 1004
Location: Sacramento, CA
Car Model:
So with this carb, would it be a good idea to go ahead and buy 56's anyway?


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 8:42 pm 
Offline
Turbo EFI
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 1:49 pm
Posts: 2445
Location: Lubbock, TX
Car Model:
I would run a #58. In my experience, it seems the best for fuel economey (around 22mpg in my 3600+lb Satellite) and still be able to get good power (not run out of breath over 60).


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 29, 2007 4:54 pm 
Offline
Turbo EFI
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 4:33 pm
Posts: 1004
Location: Sacramento, CA
Car Model:
So I rebuilt it today. Opened up the thing the float sets in and noticed I had a ball bearing just rolling around there. So I looked around and found a spring just sticking out of that piece where theres the two holes with the springs held in by the ball bearing and ring piece to go on top. The right one apparently came off at some point. Im guessing thats the reason why I was getting 10mpg? I took the jet out and it said it was a 52. Is that pretty bad? You guys were saying 56-58 while I was running rich with a 52. Should I replace the jet anyway or was I running rich because of the spring deal that came apart?


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 29, 2007 5:16 pm 
Offline
Board Sponsor & Contributor

Joined: Thu Oct 31, 2002 5:39 pm
Posts: 24486
Location: North America
Car Model:
Yep, you've found the problem (or, at least you have found part of the problem.)

've posted before about a Holley 1920 I once had on my '65 that exhibited strange behavior: The engine ran very well and had fine power, but was suspiciously easy to start and drive from cold (zero choke required, just hop in, turn the key and drive off without any stalling or gasping...even with the choke disconnected!) and the car was getting under 10 mpg. Turned out the brass seat ring that retains the power valve check ball, had fallen out of the metering block. Result was that the power valve was always WIDE open. I put the metering valve back together and restaked the seat ring, and things went back to normal (20mpg, choke and careful cold driving required). That metering block inside the Holley 1920 has all kinds of tiny passages and check balls that can make problems without any outward signs...

_________________
一期一会
Too many people who were born on third base actually believe they've hit a triple.

Image


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 29, 2007 5:18 pm 
Offline
Guru
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 14, 2002 4:32 pm
Posts: 4880
Location: Working in Silicon Valley, USA
Car Model:
You have a later 1920 with a 2 stage power enrichment valve. (power valve) Holley calls this the "economiser valve" in the 1 bbl carbs. :roll:

A missing ball at this fuel feed control point would make the carb run rich.
Once repaired, I doubt that the engine will have any power or even come off idle with a #52 main jet. (unless that jet has been drilled-out to a larger size)

Make the repair, complete the rebuild with a "know size" main jet and test the carb's performance. Adjust as needed.
DD


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 2:04 am 
Offline
Turbo EFI
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 4:33 pm
Posts: 1004
Location: Sacramento, CA
Car Model:
Dan, that sounds a bit like my car. Doesn't take much time, if any time, to warm up in the mornings. I'll check the mileage this week to see if things are a little more normal. Although im still getting more black smoke out of the tail pipe than I want.

Thanks Doc, I'll put a new jet in when I get some time this week. After hearing about all this, im pretty weary about the jet actually being drilled out because its not running bad like you described it would with a 52 jet.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 8:27 am 
Offline
Guru
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 14, 2002 4:32 pm
Posts: 4880
Location: Working in Silicon Valley, USA
Car Model:
There could be other "leak points" in or around the metering block, that could explain why it has such a small main jet, compensation for fuel entering in into the system somewhere else.
DD


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 

All times are UTC-08:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Bing [Bot], Semrush [Bot] and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited