Good and grand, but that still only means this particular 1920 in its present configuration "sucks" (i.e., doesn't work well). Using a sample size of one to declare "1920s suck" is just not realistic (and the assertion itself is still wrong).
Bull. It's not. There's something the matter with your 1920, grandpa or no grandpa.
Further evidence that there's something the matter with it.

You are still basing your comparison "1920s suck and 1945s rule" on exactly two carburetors, and that's just stinkin' thinkin'.

_________________
一期一会
Too many people who were born on third base actually believe they've hit a triple.

Good and grand, but that still only means this particular 1920 in its present configuration "sucks" (i.e., doesn't work well) - Dan

Well if it did suck....it would be working wouldnt it? ALL carbs are supposed to suck

_________________
Regards,
Fanie Gerber
It's never junk, it's just a part you're not currently using

http://www.valiant50.co.za
Just say I own a few Mopars

Ok, let me say it diferently, my 1920 sucks. I have gone through two of these and both of them were bad. I have read on here as well as some other sites that some people have had som probs with theirs. I now know why that car I pulled it off of was in a junk yard.

I didn't say 1945s rule, mine was not that good either. The 1920 gives better drivability and idle quality, but thats it. I am not trying to start an argument here, I am just saying my experiences with my 1920 has not been that good.

I have done everything I could to fix the 1920, but no luck. I am putting a carter bbd 2bbl on, and its time to let someone else mess with that other carb.

_________________

'74 Duster 225 Super Six w/904
14" Cragar SS wheels

thanks guys i will try that and report the results back.

_________________
1969 Dodge Dart 4 Door 225 SL6