Slant *        6        Forum
Home Home Home
The Place to Go for Slant Six Info!
Click here to help support the Slant Six Forum!
It is currently Sun Oct 06, 2024 8:32 pm

All times are UTC-07:00




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Engine Mounts
PostPosted: Thu Feb 05, 2009 1:46 pm 
Offline
TBI Slant 6

Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2007 12:22 pm
Posts: 106
Location: Prescott Valley Az
Car Model:
I have been looking for some poly or urethane inserts for my 1978 Volare engine mounts and can't find any.I see a lot of people putting chains and straps on them.I was wondering if there would be any problems of having a set machined out of aluminum and installing them.Is the block strong enough not to break off at the mounting areas? I was thinking I could always get a universal urethane bushing and install it where the bolt goes but I would prefere just to have aluminum inserts machined and install the bolt through it.I really don't care if I can feel the engine vibrations in the car (kinda like that thought). I'm more concerned with breaking the block or causing fatigue.I have new replacement ones but the motor has quit a bit of movement in it.Any thoughts?

_________________
SOOOOO much money spent and I keep gettin' told that I could have had a V-8


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 05, 2009 1:58 pm 
Offline
Board Sponsor & Contributor

Joined: Thu Oct 31, 2002 5:39 pm
Posts: 24387
Location: North America
Car Model:
Poly spool inserts for the '73-up engine mounts are being developed by Johnny at PolyBushings. I just spoke with him; he says he should have them designed and ready for production within a couple weeks.

Solid mounts are a poor idea. You won't break the block, you'll crack the K-frame and start shedding parts, probably starting with the front suspension. The front end design of the F-body is pathetic enough even with isolation from engine vibration. Take away that isolation and things will start failing sooner than later.

_________________
一期一会
Too many people who were born on third base actually believe they've hit a triple.

Image


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 05, 2009 2:42 pm 
Offline
Turbo EFI
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 7:08 pm
Posts: 1114
Location: The Hand
Car Model:
[quote="SlantSixDan"]
Solid mounts are a poor idea. You won't break the block, you'll crack the K-frame and start shedding parts, probably starting with the front suspension. quote]

I ran a 12 second 383 big block wagon on the street & track for 3 years with solid mounts..no issues whatsoever.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 05, 2009 2:55 pm 
Offline
Board Sponsor & Contributor

Joined: Thu Oct 31, 2002 5:39 pm
Posts: 24387
Location: North America
Car Model:
What kind of wagon, with what kind of K-frame?

_________________
一期一会
Too many people who were born on third base actually believe they've hit a triple.

Image


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 05, 2009 5:40 pm 
Offline
Turbo EFI
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 7:08 pm
Posts: 1114
Location: The Hand
Car Model:
1966 Coronet. V8 k-Frame.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 05, 2009 7:49 pm 
Offline
Turbo EFI
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2002 2:50 pm
Posts: 1742
Location: Spokane Valley, WA
Car Model:
Do you drive it daily?

If yes, I'd honestly stick with the rubber mounts and use a torque strap. Even with new rubber spool type mounts, I noticed a LOT more vibration in my car than with the old worn out inserts. It's still comfortable, but I would imagine that with poly inserts, the vibration would be too uncomfortable for a DD.

_________________
'74 Duster w/ HEI ignition, beat to snot suspension, A904, 8.25" 3.55 SG rear, still being tuned up and gets 17 MPG

Know how they always build a better idiot? That's me


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 05, 2009 10:52 pm 
Offline
Board Sponsor & Contributor

Joined: Thu Oct 31, 2002 5:39 pm
Posts: 24387
Location: North America
Car Model:
Quote:
1966 Coronet. V8 k-Frame.
So this applies to my comments about F-body shake-apart...how?

_________________
一期一会
Too many people who were born on third base actually believe they've hit a triple.

Image


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 05, 2009 11:07 pm 
Offline
Supercharged
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 9:20 pm
Posts: 13031
Location: Fircrest, WA
Car Model: 76 D100
Quote:
Poly spool inserts for the '73-up engine mounts are being developed by Johnny at PolyBushings. I just spoke with him; he says he should have them designed and ready for production within a couple weeks.

Solid mounts are a poor idea. You won't break the block, you'll crack the K-frame and start shedding parts, probably starting with the front suspension. The front end design of the F-body is pathetic enough even with isolation from engine vibration. Take away that isolation and things will start failing sooner than later.
You hurt my 5th Ave's feelings Dan. :wink: :lol:


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 06, 2009 12:04 am 
Offline
Supercharged
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2005 8:32 pm
Posts: 7834
Location: Portland-ish
Car Model: Fiat 500e
Reed,

I wouldn't worry about it much. Aside from the torsion bar doing double duty as a strut rod and the so-so upper control arm mounting the F/M/J suspension is quite robust. There is a reinforcement kit for the upper control arm mounting so that's an easy fix.

If one wants to firm up insert type mounts which have voids you can fill the voids with windshield setting urethane. The Dodge Colt Turbo I had briefly had an engine mount that had been filled. The vibration was certainly noticeable, but not objectionable. I6s don't have the same vibrations as an I4, but solid mounts still aren't fun in a street car. I also value my hearing.

An F-body would actually get less vibration into the cabin than an A-body with solid motor mounts as the whole F-body front subframe is carried on bushings.

_________________
Joshua


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 06, 2009 6:49 am 
Offline
Turbo EFI
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 7:08 pm
Posts: 1114
Location: The Hand
Car Model:
Quote:
Quote:
1966 Coronet. V8 k-Frame.
So this applies to my comments about F-body shake-apart...how?
I've driven hopped up F bodies daily too without any problems either. I didn't have solids though.


Top
   
 Post subject: Engine Mounts
PostPosted: Fri Feb 06, 2009 2:53 pm 
Offline
TBI Slant 6

Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2007 12:22 pm
Posts: 106
Location: Prescott Valley Az
Car Model:
Thanks for the input.I like the idea of filling the mounts with urethane.My only thing is when running the car hard you can really feel the motor move and it making the trans move lot also.I have aluminum front K-member mounts instead of the original rubber ones.I dully disassemble and sand blasted and inspected the K-member and it sure looks pretty rugged,even for a built six.I'll try filling the mounts and see what happens.I don't care if I can feel the motor,it's not like it's a daily driver.My biggest worry was if I had solid mounts made would the block handle it and not crack.I'm only launching the car off the foot brake/line lock but the few times I launched it hard there was a lot of movment.I put in new inserts.I was really thinking of only having a solid mount made for the left mount ( torque side) and leaving the insert in the right side for a little cushion.Seems to me that if I secured the left side of the motor it would be a big help?I guess I'll find out shortly and I'm supposed to have my motor back in a couple of weeks.

_________________
SOOOOO much money spent and I keep gettin' told that I could have had a V-8


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 7:20 pm 
Offline
Turbo Slant 6

Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 1:17 pm
Posts: 776
Location: Jacksonville, Fl
Car Model:
just my .02 but what I am planning on doing is welding the round insert piece that holds the rubber "bushing", because the 2 tack welds broke that hold it in place, burn out the rubber, make a cheap i.e. cardboard backing plate superglued on the one side, put the bolt through from the bottom *make sure its centered !!* fill it with flexane 94, sort of like thishttp://www.nicoclub.com/articles.php?id=215490


-Mike

_________________
I am the Guardian, I hate helos, everything leaks.......


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 7:28 pm 
Offline
Turbo Slant 6

Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 1:17 pm
Posts: 776
Location: Jacksonville, Fl
Car Model:
http://www.fastenal.com/web/products.ex ... allpartial

And heres where to get it, very good people to deal with,


-Mike

_________________
I am the Guardian, I hate helos, everything leaks.......


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 8:22 pm 
Offline
3 Deuce Weber
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 56
Location: East Brunswick, NJ
Car Model:
I dont want to hijack the thread but I was working on my 80 Volare today and noticed that both engine mounts are pretty worn out. I checked Rockauto.com (my new favorite online place to order parts) and see that there is a complete LEFT side mount for $7.89 but for the RIGHT side only the rubber insert is listed for $4.17. I checked NAPA online and only found the inserts.
It is common to replace just the insert on an SL6? How difficult is it to replace just the insert?
Thank you,
Scott

_________________
Scott
1956 Dodge Custom Royal Lancer
1980 Road Runner (Dont call it a Volare!)
2002 Dodge Ram 1500 Quad Cab
1976 Corvette Stingray


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ] 

All times are UTC-07:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited