Quote:
I didn't do the front to rear section because it was buried under the undercoating (no external corrosion) . Didn't want to chip it out.
Good point. Let the undercoating continue to do its job; no reason to create a breach for either the line or the frame rail. So, unless it's a show car, or unless you're too much of a perfectionist to stand it, why not simply run a shiny new line in parallel, disconnect the old one and leave it safely buried?
For the record, I am 100% in favor of good hydraulic components, and have replaced many.
But your situation got me to thinking... if there's no external corrosion, is it a problem? Why replace
anything with new material that is almost certainly going to be of poorer quality than what was used decades ago?
Regarding corrosion from the inside out, if the brake fluid has been flushed periodically (as you suggest is true), then it doesn't seem anywhere near as likely. Is there a fiber optic snake small enough to see inside? Would that be a cost-effective test, or does even top-of-the-line tubing end up being cheaper?
Quote:
www.cunifer.com
Ah ha! This starts to point to an interesting solution. It turns out there's even more to the story. I found a nice
automotive paper that describes theory, history, test results... and frankly it makes such a strong case against the common steel tubing that I'm ready to replace that "regular" stuff in every car I can get my hands on, friends' cars, you name it. But wait a minute... Just because Volvo and Porsche use it, and their brake lines last virtually forever, does it mean all the other cars on the planet deserve condemnation?
More importantly, at what age does a brake line fail, and why? In my experience with 60s and 70s Chrysler products driven in salt-infested winters, the average life of a steel line was about 20 years, and rubber hoses crack by then as well, though I always saw the lines disintegrate to failure before the hoses. But in that amount of time in a mild CA climate, admiring various makes in junkyards tells me the hydraulics all still look just fine. I don't currently have any 50-yr-old lines to inspect, though I sure wouldn't trust 50-yr-old hoses. If rust is a negligible issue, then we're getting to an age (and our cars, also) where different rules apply to see whether something is worn out. If not blasted with salt, how long does a steel hydraulic line last? Is metal fatigue a factor at all, given that burst pressures in the range of 15k psi are typically at least 10x and sometime 20x a typical brake system pressures?
Lots to ponder.
- Erik