Slant *        6        Forum
Home Home Home
The Place to Go for Slant Six Info!
Click here to help support the Slant Six Forum!
It is currently Wed Jan 08, 2025 12:00 pm

All times are UTC-08:00




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Stock cam question
PostPosted: Sun Jan 17, 2016 9:30 am 
Offline
3 Deuce Weber
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 30, 2006 10:08 pm
Posts: 82
Location: Delaware
Car Model:
I've heard that the Direct Connection doc has "wrong" information. But I've never heard specifics. Is it outdated or flat out wrong?

That being said, the Mopar performance manual states that
"The best production camshaft available for the Slant Six was used in the 1971-77 engines. This mechanical camshaft had a 244 degree duration, 26 degree overlap and a lift of .406" intake and .414" exhaust"

My question is: If I am rebuilding a tired daily driver, and I'm relatively happy with stock performance BUT I'd take "free" horsepower if it's there for the taking, should I stick with my stock cam?


Top
   
 Post subject: It's...
PostPosted: Sun Jan 17, 2016 9:40 am 
Offline
Board Sponsor
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2002 8:27 pm
Posts: 9714
Location: Salem, OR
Car Model:
That cam is the best production Cam...if you are adding some compression then then the 244 Purple cam/ Erson RV10 would be the next best choice, there is another thread where Dan was working on getting one patterned by OCG so you can buy one on regrind or on a new blank.

Even the late mechanical cam wakes up a bit in a stock engine if some simple head work/porting is done and you upgrade to a super six.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 17, 2016 9:40 am 
Offline
Supercharged
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 9:20 pm
Posts: 13091
Location: Fircrest, WA
Car Model: 76 D100
What year engine do you have? Yes, the stock 71-80 cam was OK for the street, and it doesn pretty good on the street with increased compression and increased valves and porting. Board members hav even done very well with the milder 60s era cam by just doing the above mentioned head work.

If you are building a motor for a daily driver, then the stock cam is likely plenty provided you improve the ability of the head to flow air and possibly upgrade to a two barrel carb and increase the size of the exhaust system.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 17, 2016 9:54 am 
Offline
3 Deuce Weber
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 30, 2006 10:08 pm
Posts: 82
Location: Delaware
Car Model:
DusterIdiot - yes the group buy thing is what got me thinking about this. I was wondering if it's "worth it". Not so much worth it financially but worth it in the sense of how non-stock parts can sometimes lead to other complications.

In the case of a reground cam, I think the pushrods might need to be longer (or if I have enough adjustment, may be as simple as re-adjusting the valves.)

Question: If I put in a re-ground cam AND shave the head do I approximately end up where I started?

Reed - This is a '72 stock 225. I plan to stick with a one barrel because I feel the performance upgrade won't be worth it financially AND I have a NOS Holley I bought from SSD ten years ago.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 17, 2016 10:48 am 
Offline
Supercharged
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 9:20 pm
Posts: 13091
Location: Fircrest, WA
Car Model: 76 D100
OK- I say keep the cam, keep the single barrel, improve the compression and head flow, and increase the exhaust diameter. That should make a noticeable difference.


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 

All times are UTC-08:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 7 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited