Slant *        6        Forum
Home Home Home
The Place to Go for Slant Six Info!
Click here to help support the Slant Six Forum!
It is currently Mon Dec 02, 2024 12:02 pm

All times are UTC-08:00




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 28 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 2
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 01, 2005 10:07 am 
Offline
Turbo EFI
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2002 2:50 pm
Posts: 1742
Location: Spokane Valley, WA
Car Model:
Why not just run a wire from the regulator's grounding point to a known good chassis ground, or even directly to the battery's negative post?

I redid my truck's charging system with all 1AWG welding cable and WOW! It charges like a champ now. I plan to do the same with my girl's Dart at some point. It's okay for now, but eventually it'll get dual batteries wired up with welding cable. A deep cycle to run headlights, stereo and other accessories; and the regular starting battery for running the engine, ignition and starter.

I found that the best way to make your own charging/ground cables is to get heavy duty copper lugs and heavy shrink wrap (I got mine from an Interstate Battery store in Spokane). Strip about a half inch of insulation from the cable Then put the lug in a vice, heat it up with an acetelene (sp?) torch and fill it with lead based solder. While keeping it hot, dip the stripped end of the cable into the molten solder and keep the heat on the lug for a few more seconds so let the cable heat up and absorb the solder. Let it cool and then apply a 1-inch section of the shrink tubing with a heat gun. I was able to get red shrink tubing for my charging cable and black for my ground cables. Charge is solid as a rock now, and my headlights are WAY brighter with the combination of that and the headlight harness I made a couple years back.

This is the method I'll be using for the Dart as well when I get around to it.

_________________
'74 Duster w/ HEI ignition, beat to snot suspension, A904, 8.25" 3.55 SG rear, still being tuned up and gets 17 MPG

Know how they always build a better idiot? That's me


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 01, 2005 11:51 am 
Offline
Board Sponsor & Contributor

Joined: Thu Oct 31, 2002 5:39 pm
Posts: 24449
Location: North America
Car Model:
Quote:
Why not just run a wire from the regulator's grounding point to a known good chassis ground, or even directly to the battery's negative post?
With a decades-old vehicle, there's scarcely any such a thing as a "good chassis ground" through the body sheet metal. Directly to battery negative is a good idea in addition to grounding the regulator base to the alternator housing, not instead of doing so.
Quote:
eventually it'll get dual batteries wired up with welding cable. A deep cycle to run headlights, stereo and other accessories; and the regular starting battery for running the engine, ignition and starter.
...why?

_________________
一期一会
Too many people who were born on third base actually believe they've hit a triple.

Image


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 02, 2005 12:08 am 
Offline
Turbo EFI
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 1:49 pm
Posts: 2445
Location: Lubbock, TX
Car Model:
Great information. I know what I'll be doing on my weekend! 8)


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 04, 2005 6:50 pm 
Offline
Turbo EFI
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2002 2:50 pm
Posts: 1742
Location: Spokane Valley, WA
Car Model:
Quote:
With a decades-old vehicle, there's scarcely any such a thing as a "good chassis ground" through the body sheet metal. Directly to battery negative is a good idea in addition to grounding the regulator base to the alternator housing, not instead of doing so.
Aah, true point. I hadn't considered the age of the sheet metal. Though why would you only use a wire directly to the battery terminal in addition to the regular ground, and not instead of? Is it because of other electrical stuff being grounded to the body?
Quote:
...why?
Redundancy baby 8)
The use of the deep cycle allows me to use whatever accessories are powered by it without fear of draining the battery if I'm not running the engine. I want the extra reserve of two batteries to power my winch when I install it. The fat cable allows for literally ZERO resistance to the current (I checked it. It's a beautiful thing) and will last a LONG time. Also, if I do something that, for whatever reason, causes the main battery to drain, I can jump it with the deep cycle. The isolator I'm buying is built for just such applications. Hellroaring makes it. I don't know if any of you guys have heard of 'em, but I'm told by many people that they're a great company with outstanding products.

_________________
'74 Duster w/ HEI ignition, beat to snot suspension, A904, 8.25" 3.55 SG rear, still being tuned up and gets 17 MPG

Know how they always build a better idiot? That's me


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 04, 2005 9:44 pm 
Offline
TBI Slant 6

Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2003 10:50 pm
Posts: 169
Car Model:
If you have a continuity checker and your ground checks out you are fine.A ground is a ground.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 05, 2005 4:36 am 
Offline
SL6 Racer & Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 19, 2002 12:06 pm
Posts: 8713
Location: Silver Springs, Fl.
Car Model:
Quote:
If you have a continuity checker and your ground checks out you are fine.A ground is a ground.
Actually, that is a very poor way to check a ground. It will tell you if you have a ground, but not if it is a GOOD ground. The best way to check a ground is by the voltage drop, while the circuit is operating.

_________________
Charrlie_S
65 Valiant 100 2dr post 170 turbo
66 Valiant Signet 170 nitrous
64 Valiant Signet
64 Valiant 4dr 170
64 Valiant 4dr 225


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 05, 2005 8:08 am 
Offline
Board Sponsor & Contributor

Joined: Thu Oct 31, 2002 5:39 pm
Posts: 24449
Location: North America
Car Model:
Quote:
If you have a continuity checker and your ground checks out you are fine.A ground is a ground.
That is not correct. A continuity checker is an extremely low-current device, which will show continuity between two points even if they present unacceptable resistance to a load as small as half an amp. Furthermore, even at the same current draw, different kinds of devices have different requirements for quality of ground. Simpler devices are happy with a ground that's good on average. Electronic and computerised devices require a "signal quality" (or "clean") ground. Just ask Sandy in BC or look Here.

_________________
一期一会
Too many people who were born on third base actually believe they've hit a triple.

Image


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 05, 2005 12:33 pm 
Offline
TBI Slant 6

Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2003 10:50 pm
Posts: 169
Car Model:
All Sandy said was that he used a larger ground strap.He doesn't mention running it anywhere different.

If electronics require a "signal quality" or "clean ground" why did the egineer's at Chrysler determine that grounding the VR to the firewall was efficient,or all that was necessary?


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 05, 2005 2:50 pm 
Offline
Board Sponsor
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2003 2:37 pm
Posts: 4194
Location: CA
Car Model:
When the cars were new and everything was fresh and un -rusted/corroded/etc the screws to the firewall worked. Spotwelds between fenders conducted well.

4 decades later spotwelds between fenders don't work so well and corrosion creeps into the wires. Running a ground wire directly to the VR body is just an effective, quick, cheap fix for this.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 05, 2005 4:46 pm 
Offline
Board Sponsor & Contributor

Joined: Thu Oct 31, 2002 5:39 pm
Posts: 24449
Location: North America
Car Model:
Also because electronics were not in use in autos in the 1960s, and ground quality for control circuits wasn't as critical. That said, I've cured many cars of "flickering lights and jittering ammeter needle" syndrome with nothing more than a ground wire installed from the (mechanical) regulator's base to the alternator housing. In all cases, a continuity meter showed continuity between the regulator base and the alternator housing without the wire; in all cases that just wasn't good enough.

I'm really not sure what's so hard to understand about this.

_________________
一期一会
Too many people who were born on third base actually believe they've hit a triple.

Image


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 05, 2005 11:14 pm 
Offline
Turbo EFI
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 1:49 pm
Posts: 2445
Location: Lubbock, TX
Car Model:
Well, I ran a ground wire (14 guage) from the regulator to the alternator housing. However, I couldn't find a place on the alternator to just throw a bolt into, so I used the long bolt that holds the alternator halves together, under the head in the front. I can tell a difference, as now the alternator guage stays steady and shows a slight charge with the lights on, instead of staying in the middle. Hit the brakes, slight discharge and back to charge. Nice. :D I also moved the ground wire I had on the ECU from the inner fender to the case, under the wire from the regulator to make sure the ground is good. Thanks for the tip Dan and to you other guys for some good discussion.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 06, 2005 7:42 am 
Offline
Turbo Slant 6
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2005 12:22 pm
Posts: 580
Location: Austin Texas
Car Model:
Quote:
If you have a continuity checker and your ground checks out you are fine.A ground is a ground.

That's not very accurate. A continuity checker runs a signal of a few milliamps through a connection to test it. A connection that can carry a few milliamps with "as close to zero" resistance as the meter can measure might actually have enough resistance at several amps to provide a very poor ground. And also, there are high frequency components on the line (from the rectified 3-phase output of the alternator, from the ignition, etc.) that sometimes do funny things at marginal connections.

This is also very true on the FEED side of the regulator. On most Chrysler vehicles, a single wire feeds the regulator/alternator field, the ignition, and (on later vehicles) the electric choke heater. The result is that the current flowing through that wire to feed all those loads causes a voltage drop in the wire, so the regulator senses an artificially low voltage. This sometimes results in excessively high voltage out of the alternator, and is a bit rough on batteries and headlamps, and other systems). Its a good idea not only to clean up the GROUND side of things, re-wire things to distribute the ignition load, alternator/regulator load, and electric choke loads a bit better.

In answer to the question "why did Chrysler do it the way they did if its not good enough?" Simple. They really weren't expecting these cars to be driven in the numbers that they are 40 years after they were built. In 1960, there were a LOT fewer 1920 cars on the road (percentage wise and straight numbers wise) than there are 1960 cars on the road today.

_________________
Image


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 06, 2005 11:46 am 
Offline
TBI Slant 6

Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2003 10:50 pm
Posts: 169
Car Model:
If you have to run a wire to your alt,and it works for you that is great.But you are not getting to what the real problem is in your electrical,bad grounds,connections etc.

My car is a 65,I took the time to go all through it (cleaning grounds,checking wiring etc).I have a electronic VR(hooked up as the factory did,grounded to the firewall)and have no Ammeter jumping problems.

JZ


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 28 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 2

All times are UTC-08:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited