Quote:
The Carter is a better-designed carb.
Well, I've done more tinkering with the Carter than the Holley... so I'm not sure whether my inclination to agree is all that relevant. But as long as the discussion is here, let me pose the question: are both of these 1 Bbl carbs quite cheap (derived for mass production), compared to something else? I'm not sure what, but the reputation of a Weber comes to mind, for example. Would I obtain smoother running, better fuel atomization, and so on, by merely being willing to swap in something better than whatever corners were cut on the assembly line?
It strikes me that, as good as these old cars are, they nevertheless suffer from the same maladies as any other mass-produced machinery. I've discovered it's hard to find anything that couldn't be improved at least a little bit by using better quality materials when I do repairs. I won't even bother with a tune-up, for example, unless I spend a tiny bit extra on a Blue Streak cap and rotor, and spiral-wound (inductive suppression) spark plug wires. So maybe the same should hold true for a carb.
On the other hand, the research and tuning and experiments I have done suggest that a carb (
any carb) is a surprisingly poor way to atomize and distribute fuel, especially when attempting to keep a tight rein on the fuel mixtures at varying loads, compared to multiport injection. For a large number of reasons.
With that in mind, I haven't seen any need to try an expensive carb. But I'm still curious what would happen if I did. Anyone have experience?
- Erik