Slant Six Forum
https://slantsix.org/forum/

High compression build with cast pistons?
https://slantsix.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=50846
Page 2 of 2

Author:  66aCUDA [ Sat Jan 19, 2013 3:47 pm ]
Post subject: 

Use what ever you want. It all works good. :lol:
Frank

Author:  slantzilla [ Sun Jan 20, 2013 8:51 am ]
Post subject: 

IF you keep it out of detonation cast pistons will live forever.

Detonate it very much and even forged pistons will not last.

Author:  Dart270 [ Sun Jan 20, 2013 12:47 pm ]
Post subject: 

My understanding is that forged pistons are reallly for strength at high revs (over cast), but forged are not drastically stronger than cast when overheating them with detonation.

Lou

Author:  Sprag [ Sun Jan 20, 2013 8:05 pm ]
Post subject: 

Thanks again for the advice, it really helps and now I think I've done it right so far :D My plan is to keep the RPM out of the stratosphere, stay away from the spray and focus on getting the dynamic compression right once I upgrade to the high compression set-up later on. For now, the stock stuff is looking pretty good for the first stage since everything other than the mild bump in SCR (9 - 9.5:1?) will be "optimized" stocker stuff. After the pistons go in, I'll start measuring and ask for a double check on my first attempt at making an accurate DCR calculation.

Stage Two planning is underway - Offy 4 bbl intake has arrived, header dreams run rampant and the separate budget for the E85 carb is in the works. :mrgreen:

Author:  NCDemon1971 [ Sun Jun 23, 2013 9:27 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: If stock...

Quote:
So far my 1980's engines have had a stock deck heght in the .175-.190 range making it hard to make a 'guess' without actual measurements. The peanut plug head has seen a range of about 56-52 cc at the chamber after taken off the engine without modification...the 1976-1978 head are a bit tighter in the 53-54 cc range stock...

To get 12:1 out of a 1963 block and 1978 head I ended up cutting .120 off the block and about .100 out of the head....(you will need ARP head studs after this...)

FYI,

-D.Idiot
I have noticed this to. My previous bracket car ('71 Duster) was a 1974 steel crank engine with a later style peanut plug head. I recently had a tube style head from a 198 milled over .100 and when compared to the peanut plug head, it shocked me at how close the chambers looked. The peanut plug head was stock/untouched.

Maybe I should have done the peanut plug style head. I already had hours of port work into the 198 head though and if you are weight freak like me, the tube heads are a tad bit lighter.

Good info, D.Idiot!

Page 2 of 2 All times are UTC-07:00
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
https://www.phpbb.com/