Slant Six Forum https://slantsix.org/forum/ |
|
Oregon Cam ker-WHAT? https://slantsix.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=60578 |
Page 2 of 2 |
Author: | Doctor Dodge [ Thu Dec 22, 2016 8:53 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Quote: There are some cam cores with a thicker shaft...
I have also seen these "thick shaft" cams and agree that I tend to find them in the early engines... both 170s & 225sI got one from Oregon Cam Grinding for the Bonneville engine. Imagine the shaft being thick enough that it nearly comes to the base circle of the lobes. I was told by OCG that the smaller shaft was done for rod clearance, but it think that's a mistake. So if you want a really heavy, strong cam, buy the "170" cam. I think Chrysler went to the smaller shaft design simply for cost savings / weight reduction. These kinds of changes usually come from the supplier(s) who are constantly getting pushed for cost reductions. Chrysler asks for cheaper parts as they ramp-up production and the supply base says OK... as long as you change xxx, in this case, that change was taking some cast iron out of the cam cores. Just my 2 cents... DD |
Author: | Old6rodder [ Thu Dec 22, 2016 9:27 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Quote: Quote: There are some cam cores with a thicker shaft...
I have also seen these "thick shaft" cams and agree that I tend to find them in the early engines... both 170s & 225sI got one from Oregon Cam Grinding for the Bonneville engine. Imagine the shaft being thick enough that it nearly comes to the base circle of the lobes. I was told by OCG that the smaller shaft was done for rod clearance, but it think that's a mistake. So if you want a really heavy, strong cam, buy the "170" cam. I think Chrysler went to the smaller shaft design simply for cost savings / weight reduction. These kinds of changes usually come from the supplier(s) who are constantly getting pushed for cost reductions. Chrysler asks for cheaper parts as they ramp-up production and the supply base says OK... as long as you change xxx, in this case, that change was taking some cast iron out of the cam cores. Just my 2 cents... DD |
Author: | SlantSixDan [ Thu Dec 22, 2016 9:29 am ] |
Post subject: | |
That makes a lot more sense. Thanks, all. |
Page 2 of 2 | All times are UTC-08:00 |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited https://www.phpbb.com/ |