| Slant Six Forum https://slantsix.org/forum/ |
|
| 1972 Dodge Colt https://slantsix.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=63924 |
Page 53 of 81 |
| Author: | hyper_pak [ Tue Jan 16, 2024 1:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 1972 Dodge Colt |
Matt There is a void on the crank right where that booger is on the Damper. I guess it moved metal from one surface to the other. It's not pretty. |
|
| Author: | Greg Ondayko [ Tue Jan 16, 2024 1:40 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 1972 Dodge Colt |
I always Loctite my cam bolt and also use an air impact on them for tigntening purposes. Sometimes they can be not completely centered or seated on the cam snout if you are not careful. Makes sense now why stan's engine was so lazy. I bet that dowel was broken a while back allowing the cam to become retarded quite a bit. Greg |
|
| Author: | hyper_pak [ Tue Jan 16, 2024 2:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 1972 Dodge Colt |
I had forgotten to Locktite the bolt. The cam bumper is what kept it close and not flying around in the cover. I think it was loose on the last two runs, but not sheared. It sheared on the return road when it quit running and would not restart. Not the reason for it being lazy. It ran it's best time by a half second on the second to last run. |
|
| Author: | Charrlie_S [ Tue Jan 16, 2024 2:52 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 1972 Dodge Colt |
That is one reason high performance big blocks went to the 3 bolt cam/sprocket. |
|
| Author: | hyper_pak [ Tue Jan 16, 2024 3:02 pm ] | ||
| Post subject: | Re: 1972 Dodge Colt | ||
And a few high output slants!
|
|||
| Author: | slantzilla [ Tue Jan 16, 2024 3:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 1972 Dodge Colt |
Us po folk cain't efford none that fancy crap. |
|
| Author: | hyper_pak [ Tue Jan 16, 2024 4:15 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 1972 Dodge Colt |
Well if you didn't spend all your money on expensive motorcycles you could have some fancy stuff!!!!!! |
|
| Author: | slantzilla [ Tue Jan 16, 2024 4:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 1972 Dodge Colt |
| Author: | Exner Geek [ Wed Jan 17, 2024 6:40 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 1972 Dodge Colt |
Stan was there any signs of metal transfer on the crank flange? |
|
| Author: | hyper_pak [ Wed Jan 17, 2024 9:28 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 1972 Dodge Colt |
No Seymour, the crank, flywheel surfaces all look great. Next week after it warms up a little I will pull the pan and look at the bearings. |
|
| Author: | Rick Covalt [ Wed Jan 17, 2024 9:40 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 1972 Dodge Colt |
Quote: No Seymour, the crank, flywheel surfaces all look great.
I guess that is good, but very odd it didn't tear up the crank coming off. |
|
| Author: | hyper_pak [ Wed Jan 17, 2024 2:47 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 1972 Dodge Colt |
What do you mean Rick? I don't understand what you are saying. It did mess up the front, enough to ruin the crank I don't know. The rear flange is fine. Splain it to me again. |
|
| Author: | Rick Covalt [ Wed Jan 17, 2024 5:29 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 1972 Dodge Colt |
When you said - "No Seymour, the crank, flywheel surfaces all look great." I thought you were saying the crank snout was Ok. I guess I misunderstood. |
|
| Author: | hyper_pak [ Thu Jan 18, 2024 6:47 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: 1972 Dodge Colt |
No problem, I think he was wondering if I had a big imbalance in the crank rod assembly. |
|
| Page 53 of 81 | All times are UTC-07:00 |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|