Slant Six Forum https://slantsix.org/forum/ |
|
Roller Rocker Ratios https://slantsix.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2365 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | Richard Moore [ Thu Jul 05, 2001 12:02 am ] |
Post subject: | Roller Rocker Ratios |
Hi, I have some questions regarding roller rocker ratios I hope someone can help with. I am building(very slowly) a drag race slant six car and want a set of roller rockers. I have contacted Rocker Arm Specialist through the link on this site and they say they can supply in 1.5(stock), 1.55, or 1.6 ratio and a search of old messages about roller rockers mentioned them making a 1.7 ratio rocker. What I want to know is advantages or disadvantages of the various ratios. How are ratios changed, I assume that the length of the push rod side of the rocker is changed. Is it better to get extra valve lift from a higher rocker ratio or from more cam lift. I have yet to buy cam. Which way round puts less stress on valve train.Ideally I would like to buy one set of rockers that I can use with a variety of cam profiles. Regards Richard Moore richard.e.moore@paradise.net.nz |
Author: | Dave W [ Mon Jul 09, 2001 1:55 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Roller Rocker Ratios |
Generally, higher rocker arm ratios are the way to go. The lifter has to be able to follow the cam profile. For any given duration, there is a limit to how much lift you can grind into the camshaft. The larger Mopar lifters will will allow a more aggressive profile than Ford or GM, but there is still a limit. A higher rocker arm ratio lets you get a higher lift for more power without having to increase duration and losing drivability. The valve springs obviously close the valves, but they also keep the lifters on the camshaft. Working backwards through the increased rocker arm ratio, the valve spring doesn't have to be as stiff to move the pushrod and lifter at any given RPM. Quote:
: : Hi, : I have some questions regarding roller rocker : ratios I hope someone can help with. I am : building(very slowly) a drag race slant six : car and want a set of roller rockers. I have : contacted Rocker Arm Specialist through the : link on this site and they say they can : supply in 1.5(stock), 1.55, or 1.6 ratio and : a search of old messages about roller : rockers mentioned them making a 1.7 ratio : rocker. What I want to know is advantages or : disadvantages of the various ratios. How are : ratios changed, I assume that the length of : the push rod side of the rocker is changed. : Is it better to get extra valve lift from a : higher rocker ratio or from more cam lift. I : have yet to buy cam. Which way round puts : less stress on valve train.Ideally I would : like to buy one set of rockers that I can : use with a variety of cam profiles. : : Regards : Richard Moore dwordinger@earthlink.net |
Author: | Doc [ Mon Jul 09, 2001 2:15 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Roller Rocker Ratios & Coil Bind |
Quote:
: Generally, higher rocker arm ratios are the way : to go. The lifter has to be able to follow : the cam profile. For any given duration, : there is a limit to how much lift you can : grind into the camshaft. The larger Mopar : lifters will will allow a more aggressive : profile than Ford or GM, but there is still : a limit. A higher rocker arm ratio lets you : get a higher lift for more power without : having to increase duration and losing : drivability. The valve springs obviously : close the valves, but they also keep the : lifters on the camshaft. Working backwards : through the increased rocker arm ratio, the : valve spring doesn't have to be as stiff to : move the pushrod and lifter at any given : RPM. The only concern will be the spring's "installed height". SL6 engines run the "short" 1.7 springs which could "coil bind" if the cam / rocker ratio gets to aggressive. Most of the racers go to the taller valves / springs (1.8 or more) to allow room for the extra valve lift. DD |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC-07:00 |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited https://www.phpbb.com/ |