Slant *        6        Forum
Home Home Home
The Place to Go for Slant Six Info!
Click here to help support the Slant Six Forum!
It is currently Sat Dec 27, 2025 12:50 pm

All times are UTC-08:00




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Heavy cam?
PostPosted: Tue Jan 11, 2011 5:26 pm 
Offline
Turbo Slant 6
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2003 6:43 pm
Posts: 976
Location: SoCal
Car Model: Toad Wagon
Heavy, as in size and pounds.

Howdy, would this be early stock or aftermarket?

I opened up an old three plug block I have for the next engine for my Toad wagon. Three things struck me as odd.

First was the crank. I don't have another crank handy for direct comparison but this crank looks heavy visually. A pattern maker by trade, I can usually trust my eyes.

Second was the cam, clearly heavy. I do have a few stock and aftermarket cams out and they all measure around 1.030" for the shafts. The one I pulled from this block measures 1.260" at the shaft.
The lift is .234" on evenly worn lobes, suggesting a stock profile. The lobe and heel are .692" and .458" though, larger than what I've seen before but consistant with the shaft size. This cam weighs close to 10 lbs, vs the 7 of my others.

The third seeming anomaly was the fitting of dumbell lifters rather than full solids as I've seen in other stockers. Rebuild, perhaps?

Nothing else appears odd at first glance. The cam bearing sizes are normal, all else seems normal.

I read the corneer stamping but I know little of that info. It's T22 3 22 2, with that spacing.

So, early or odd? What say you? :?

_________________
Sex, drags, and rock & roll.
Dick, 225% crazy.
Hobby (cars, that is) Photos link


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 11, 2011 5:38 pm 
Offline
Guru
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 14, 2002 4:32 pm
Posts: 4880
Location: Working in Silicon Valley, USA
Car Model:
Early and somewhat odd... compaired to the more "common" SL6 stuff most people use these days.

I have seen a number of the heavy cranks and cams, most come out of 1960 / 61 engines.
I always wondered why the engineers thought these parts had to be that heavy in the original design and first engines built...
(Used as a "safety margin", in a time when steel and gas was cheap?)

As for the "dumb-bell" shaped lifters... it seems like most of the factory solid lifters used in the 60s and early 70s were that shape.
DD


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 11, 2011 6:03 pm 
Offline
Turbo Slant 6
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2003 6:43 pm
Posts: 976
Location: SoCal
Car Model: Toad Wagon
Initial "overkill" in the original developement, and backed off later? Sounds likely.

I must've been getting rebuilds then, in my other engines, to have a preponderance of full bodied lifters.

Thanks for the info, I think the heavier crank'll be OK in the Toad wagon as it's mostly for towing and hauling (think "pick up truck, with a built in camper shell" :lol: ). The cam'll be after market though, so the lighter one.

_________________
Sex, drags, and rock & roll.
Dick, 225% crazy.
Hobby (cars, that is) Photos link


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC-08:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 29 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited