Slant Six Forum
https://slantsix.org/forum/

tie rod end difference
https://slantsix.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=57187
Page 1 of 1

Author:  '67 Dart 270 [ Sun Mar 01, 2015 10:31 am ]
Post subject:  tie rod end difference

What's the difference between the tie rod ends for the 67 vs the 76? I see Moog has part number 319 for the older and part number 401 for the later.

I've swapped to 73-76 K frame and link, but I'm keeping my older 9" drums, lower ball joint for now. Will the later tie rod ends fit the older lower ball joint?

thanks,

Brian

Author:  '67 Dart 270 [ Sun Mar 01, 2015 10:52 am ]
Post subject:  bend angle?

It looks like maybe the newer ones have a slightly different angle to them for the later center link?

Is the taper on the shaft with the castle nut the same? thanks.

brian

Author:  Dart270 [ Sun Mar 01, 2015 1:14 pm ]
Post subject: 

All A-body tie rods and ends should be interchangeable, at least 62-76 and possibly 60-61 also. I have the 11/16" C-body ends and rods on most of my cars, which also are a direct bolt in and are thicker and more rigid.

Lou

Author:  '67 Dart 270 [ Sun Mar 01, 2015 3:23 pm ]
Post subject:  Crazy...

Ha, that's funny, Summit sells the "older" ones for 3x what the newer ones cost...


http://www.summitracing.com/parts/mog-e ... model/dart


http://www.summitracing.com/parts/mog-e ... model/dart

brian

Author:  Dart270 [ Mon Mar 02, 2015 5:13 am ]
Post subject: 

I can't figure that. Maybe there is some quality difference?

BTW, the C-body tie rods/ends are years 74-78 (e.g., Plymouth Fury), in case you want those.

Best,

Lou

Author:  Demon71/kevin [ Fri Mar 06, 2015 9:26 am ]
Post subject:  large Tierods (11/16)

I looked up the Fury (1975) on rock auto the only tie rods that are listed are the 9/16" ones? Is there a different car that will have these?

Author:  sandy in BC [ Fri Mar 06, 2015 10:40 am ]
Post subject: 

Plymouth Fury in 1978 is a late B body......


try 1978 Chrysler New Yorker

I notice there are only a few remaining on the Rock Auto site.

Author:  Dart270 [ Fri Mar 06, 2015 12:45 pm ]
Post subject: 

Oops, sorry about the body/badge error. Yes, New Yorker would be correct. Also, the upper limit on the year may be 1977, not 1978.

Best,

Lou

Author:  DusterIdiot [ Fri Mar 06, 2015 5:20 pm ]
Post subject:  I would...

You want 11/16" tie rods...just put it smack dab in the middle of the 70's for late C-bodies before they went the way of the Dinosaurs: ask for them from a 1975 New Yorker or Imperial.... that puts you farther back from that edge where some cars (Sport Fury) went from being a C-body to a B-body.... and weren't so luckily equipped. That's what I have under both Dusters at this time, and they were Moog Parts.

(Dan should correct me, but I think that is also the only year that Mopar offered rear slider disc brakes on the C-body Imperial with the 9 1/4" rear end...)

Author:  '67 Dart 270 [ Fri Mar 06, 2015 6:04 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: quality difference

I don't think it's a quality difference; Moog makes good stuff. Might just be that they're phasing out the older ones? I mean if they are identical, then why have two part numbers for the same piece. Anyway, I got the newer 1/3 of the price ones.

brian

Author:  DusterIdiot [ Fri Mar 06, 2015 6:19 pm ]
Post subject:  Is it?

Quote:
I mean if they are identical, then why have two part numbers for the same piece.
Is it the same piece, or is it the left hand/right hand threaded ends for each rod assembly so you can dial them out or in without pulling them?

This thread lines it out:

http://www.slantsix.org/forum/viewtopic ... rt+numbers

Author:  '67 Dart 270 [ Fri Mar 06, 2015 9:49 pm ]
Post subject:  no it's not the twist

I only posted one example of each from Summit, they sell inner/outer RH/LH threaded ends for both the "old" and "new" ones. The old ones are just 3x the price.

brian

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC-07:00
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
https://www.phpbb.com/