Slant Six Forum
https://slantsix.org/forum/

1967 225 vs 1973 225 block
https://slantsix.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=57652
Page 1 of 1

Author:  drauhut [ Thu May 07, 2015 1:01 pm ]
Post subject:  1967 225 vs 1973 225 block

Does anyone know if the two are interchangeable?( will heads, intake/ exhaust manifolds etc etc) or how I can find out if they are. I'm assuming they are but am not certain.
I found an engine/auto trans on line for $250. It turns but hasn't started in years. Thinking of rebuilding it so I can still drive my Dart.
Can anyone see any drawbacks to doing a complete rebuild of the 67 /6 then dropping it in my 73 ?
Would it be advisable to keep one as a spare?..Not sure if this is a concern where others live, but wreckers around me don't keep anything more then 15 years old, so if my slant bites it, I'm SOL.

Thanks in advance

Author:  Joshie225 [ Thu May 07, 2015 1:22 pm ]
Post subject: 

The '67 crank won't accept your '73 torque converter as the hole in the crank is too small. You can swap in the engine/trans together no problem. Almost everything else interchanges.

Author:  Reed [ Thu May 07, 2015 2:30 pm ]
Post subject: 

You could swap cranks between the 73 and 67 engines or get the 67 crank machined to the larger diameterwhile the motor is being rebuilt.

Author:  drauhut [ Thu May 07, 2015 4:27 pm ]
Post subject: 

Quote:
The '67 crank won't accept your '73 torque converter as the hole in the crank is too small. You can swap in the engine/trans together no problem. Almost everything else interchanges.
thank you...would one motor/tranny have any advantage over the other if a total rebuild was going to done?..

Author:  DusterIdiot [ Thu May 07, 2015 5:23 pm ]
Post subject:  No...

Quote:
would one motor/tranny have any advantage over the other if a total rebuild was going to done?..
Assuming that you were going with more compression and an aftermarket cam on a ground up build, either block is fine, either head will work fine after you install new valves and seats (although the 1973 head may a have a slightly small combustion chamber volume stock compared to the 67, so less milling may be needed to get your target numbers).

If it were a question of stock engine with a rering/regasket you took care of the crank pocket thing, the 1973 engine stock would have the better camshaft, but that's about it on a side to side comparison.

Author:  drauhut [ Fri May 08, 2015 3:29 am ]
Post subject:  Re: No...

Quote:
Quote:
would one motor/tranny have any advantage over the other if a total rebuild was going to done?..
Assuming that you were going with more compression and an aftermarket cam on a ground up build, either block is fine, either head will work fine after you install new valves and seats (although the 1973 head may a have a slightly small combustion chamber volume stock compared to the 67, so less milling may be needed to get your target numbers).

If it were a question of stock engine with a rering/regasket you took care of the crank pocket thing, the 1973 engine stock would have the better camshaft, but that's about it on a side to side comparison.
Thank you
Now begins the hard part of learning what and how to change/rebuild everything. At least I can still drive my Dart while I take my time to do the spare engine up right..no rush .

Author:  drauhut [ Fri May 08, 2015 9:29 am ]
Post subject: 

thanks for your help Reed, Joshie225 and Duster.

Author:  Reed [ Fri May 08, 2015 10:27 am ]
Post subject: 

Keep the 1967 cam and have the lobe profile reground. You can save some money and wind up with a good cam.

Author:  drauhut [ Sat May 09, 2015 5:01 am ]
Post subject: 

great idea..thanks Reed...probably end up keeping one complete engine as a spare or for parting out down the road. Hard to locate original parts up this way.

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC-08:00
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
https://www.phpbb.com/