Slant Six Forum https://slantsix.org/forum/ |
|
Baby (size) Starter https://slantsix.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=59319 |
Page 1 of 2 |
Author: | Joshie225 [ Thu Mar 17, 2016 12:15 pm ] |
Post subject: | Baby (size) Starter |
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B8Nx2X ... cslist_api I got myself a late hemi Ram manual transmission starter for my not-terribly-secret, but not ready for prime time, project. $45 and $25 core. I figure a small, light, reliable, powerful starter for $70 is fair. |
Author: | Reed [ Thu Mar 17, 2016 12:18 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Cool! |
Author: | Dart270 [ Thu Mar 17, 2016 12:31 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Thanks for posting. I assume this will fit our old Mopar Slants? What is year range? Lou |
Author: | SlantSixDan [ Thu Mar 17, 2016 12:52 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Lou, see threads here where I propose this starter and call out its applications, and here and here for sights and sounds of Rick Covalt installing and testing it. |
Author: | Joshie225 [ Thu Mar 17, 2016 1:32 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
My apologies for the brief post, but I was, and am, using my phone. This starter I found through car-part.com and it was at an LKQ in Idaho. They shipped it for free to Portland where I picked it up. Thanks to Dan for the original research and Rick and Bryan for the fit and operational testing! I'm going to drill out the threaded hole, give it a quick cleaning and run it! |
Author: | Badvert65 [ Thu Mar 17, 2016 1:56 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Just curious, how much (little) does that starter weigh? |
Author: | Joshie225 [ Thu Mar 17, 2016 2:01 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Quote: Just curious, how much (little) does that starter weigh?
I'm not sure my digital kitchen scale will tell me directly, but I'll try it later. If I had to guess I'd say 5 to 6 lbs. I bought it mostly for its size and power.
|
Author: | Dart270 [ Thu Mar 17, 2016 2:03 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
OK, great. Same starter that Rick installed/tested. Thanks to all. Lou |
Author: | Joshie225 [ Thu Mar 17, 2016 9:01 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
I need to recalibrate my internal scale. With the little stub of battery cable the wreckers left on the starter it's 3 lb 3oz! |
Author: | Dart270 [ Fri Mar 18, 2016 3:59 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Wow, that is light. Amazing how heavy late model cars are given how light many of the individual parts are... Lou |
Author: | Charrlie_S [ Fri Mar 18, 2016 6:30 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Quote: Amazing how heavy late model cars are given how light many of the individual parts are...
The "magic smoke" in all those gizmos is very heavy
Lou |
Author: | Joshie225 [ Fri Mar 18, 2016 7:53 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Quote: Wow, that is light. Amazing how heavy late model cars are given how light many of the individual parts are...
The lightest of the old mini starters appears to be around 7 lbs. In this 2001 Hot Rod article the late model starter used was 10 lbs 7 oz and the original "3257" Chrysler starter was 15 lbs 9 oz. So the weight savings now available is about 12 lbs 6 oz. http://www.hotrod.com/how-to/engine/261 ... e-install/
Lou |
Author: | Greg Ondayko [ Fri Mar 18, 2016 3:06 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Hmmm. Maybe I need to get one fro Ruster! Lighter is better! Greg |
Author: | JNL [ Sat Mar 26, 2016 5:36 am ] |
Post subject: | |
great upgrade for a baby running a SM (v8) about a creeper but not so great for someone like me (stock) who can take out and put back in 15 pound starter with 1.5 hands in about 5 minutes. |
Author: | Dart270 [ Thu Mar 31, 2016 7:48 am ] |
Post subject: | |
I might question your real scale, Josh. I just bought a Denso reman version of this starter and it is 7.0 lbs on a nice digital scale. The factory Mopar one is 1/2 as light?? Be careful with weight reduction plans, folks... Still, 7 lbs is 1 lb lighter than my lightest "old" mini starter and 4 lbs less than the mini starter I pulled out of the 68 Dart. Best, Lou |
Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC-08:00 |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited https://www.phpbb.com/ |