Slant *        6        Forum
Home Home Home
The Place to Go for Slant Six Info!
Click here to help support the Slant Six Forum!
It is currently Thu Feb 20, 2025 12:05 pm

All times are UTC-08:00




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Feb 09, 2004 7:51 pm 
Offline
Turbo EFI
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 29, 2003 5:45 pm
Posts: 1903
Location: Hamilton the STEEL CITY, ON
Car Model:
Can anyone suggest cam specs for a cam that will noticeably improve smoothness of the engine throughout the stock RPM range without sacrificing horsepower? This is on a 225 super six, dynamically balanced with very mild porting (head blended to new seats). No horsepower gain is required.

_________________
I've been calling it as i see it for my entire life and that's not about to change. Take it or leave it.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 15, 2004 8:13 am 
Offline
Board Sponsor & Contributor

Joined: Thu Oct 31, 2002 5:39 pm
Posts: 24512
Location: North America
Car Model:
Stock or close-to-stock camshafts give very smooth running with a stock or close-to-stock \6...sounds like the real question might be "Why doesn't my engine run smoothly?".

What kind of roughness is it?


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 15, 2004 9:27 am 
Offline
Guru
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2002 11:22 am
Posts: 3740
Location: Sonoma, Calif.
Car Model: Many Darts and a Dacuda
The overlap event has a big influance on the smooth idle and low speed torque of an engine. If you ar building a low RPM engine, a short overlap cam is the ticket. It is interesting to note the the early SL6 have a very short overlap cam to begain with, more overlap was added in later years.
DD
http://www.dutra.org/pictures/engine/st ... -specs.jpg


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 15, 2004 10:06 am 
Offline
Turbo EFI
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 29, 2003 5:45 pm
Posts: 1903
Location: Hamilton the STEEL CITY, ON
Car Model:
Dan, the goal is to improve on the stock smoothness of the engine. It did have a pounded #2 rod bearing, but it's being rebuilt right now. I haven't done anything to increase hp other than the 2bbl intake, everything has been built to increase durability and smoothness.

Doug, thanks for the specs. I'm guessing these cams all have more or less the same lift? Are they adequate for the flow/velocity I need with the BBD? Is there anything I can do to increase rocker ratio should I need more lift to take advantage of it?

Thanks again, guys... 8)

_________________
I've been calling it as i see it for my entire life and that's not about to change. Take it or leave it.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 15, 2004 1:46 pm 
Offline
Board Sponsor & Contributor

Joined: Thu Oct 31, 2002 5:39 pm
Posts: 24512
Location: North America
Car Model:
What I'm saying is that it's tough to improve on the smoothness of a stock 225 *in good running order*. They do not run roughly in stock form unless something is wrong. (Your pounded #2 rod, for instance).

The lift increased as did the overlap and duration over the years. Early cams (to '64) had around 0.370" lift, '65-'70 cams had 0.395 or so, and '71-'80 cams had 0.410 or so. The P4120243 MP cam has 0.436". All of these cams deliver excellent engine smoothness.

I have no experience with non-Chrysler cams.


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 

All times are UTC-08:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Google [Bot], Semrush [Bot] and 14 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited