Slant *        6        Forum
Home Home Home
The Place to Go for Slant Six Info!
Click here to help support the Slant Six Forum!
It is currently Wed Dec 31, 2025 4:03 am

All times are UTC-08:00




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 29 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 2
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 06, 2006 9:29 am 
Offline
Turbo EFI
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 18, 2003 7:34 am
Posts: 2479
Location: Lubbock, Texas
Car Model: 1964 Plymouth Valiant V200 Sedan
I understand that there is a difference between how four- and two-barrel carburetors are rated, related to the vacuum used on the flow benches. Are one-barrels rated at the same vacuum as two-barrels? And are the advertised ratings to be believed, or used as a basic comparison for similar carburetors?

_________________
"When you find a big kettle of crazy, it's best not to stir it." - Pointy-haired Boss

1964 Valiant V200, 225/Pushbutton 904
BBD, CAI, HEI, LBP, AC, AM/FM/USB, EIEIO


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 06, 2006 12:39 pm 
Offline
Supercharged

Joined: Thu May 12, 2005 11:50 pm
Posts: 6291
Location: So California
Car Model: 64 Plymouth Valiant
Yes the 1bbls are rated the same as 2bbl.......... 3.0inHg vs 1.5inHg for 4bbls

_________________
Ed
64 Valiant 225 / 904 / 42:1 manual steering / 9" drum brakes

8)


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 06, 2006 2:40 pm 
Offline
Turbo Slant 6
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 8:33 pm
Posts: 745
Location: Rolla, MO
Car Model:
Quote:
Say the 1bbl carb is rated 100cfm, the 2bbl is rated at 200cfm.....

With the split manifold, one of the cylinders needs air every 240degrees of engine rotation (out of the 720degrees need for complete 4-stroke cycle). So each cylinder pulls on that 100cfm carb all by itself, and the max flow to that cylinder is limited to the 100cfm

With the single manifold, one of the cylinders needs air every 120deg of engine rotation. And although there's overlap of cylinders needing air, the 1 cylinder does at some point have most of the flow capacity of 2 barrels available to it during the intake cycle (or slightly less than 200cfm).
Ah ha, I see. I was (retardedly) thinking that the front and back sets of cylinders fired together, rather than the 180* apart that they truly are. (or something along that thought process.) Duh. Realistically, how much air is one cylinder going to pull?

_________________
Used to own:
'82 Dodge D150
Erson 270 Cam, O/S valves, mild port work, ~9.5:1 compression

Currently fighting with an '85 VW Cabriolet

My other passion


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 06, 2006 2:45 pm 
Offline
Board Sponsor
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2003 2:37 pm
Posts: 605
Location: Fairbanks, AK
Car Model:
225 cid/6 = 37.5 cid ;)

At 5000 rpm that translates to approximately 54 CFM at 100% VE, so it is actually probably closer to 40 CFM (@ 5000 rpm...)


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 06, 2006 3:19 pm 
Offline
Turbo Slant 6
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 8:33 pm
Posts: 745
Location: Rolla, MO
Car Model:
Hmm.. yeah.. I don't think enough before I ask questions. I was trying to figure the math behind it and /almost/ asked another question before I realized that it revolves twice for each intake stroke. Once again, duh.

_________________
Used to own:
'82 Dodge D150
Erson 270 Cam, O/S valves, mild port work, ~9.5:1 compression

Currently fighting with an '85 VW Cabriolet

My other passion


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 06, 2006 4:29 pm 
Offline
Supercharged

Joined: Thu May 12, 2005 11:50 pm
Posts: 6291
Location: So California
Car Model: 64 Plymouth Valiant
Quote:
225 cid/6 = 37.5 cid ;)

At 5000 rpm that translates to approximately 54 CFM at 100% VE, so it is actually probably closer to 40 CFM (@ 5000 rpm...)

But the flow isn't even (think sine wave)...... So the instantanous flow (or peak flow) will be higher so that on average it's 40cfm....

_________________
Ed
64 Valiant 225 / 904 / 42:1 manual steering / 9" drum brakes

8)


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 07, 2006 5:18 am 
Offline
Supercharged

Joined: Thu May 12, 2005 11:50 pm
Posts: 6291
Location: So California
Car Model: 64 Plymouth Valiant
Quote:
Quote:
225 cid/6 = 37.5 cid ;)

At 5000 rpm that translates to approximately 54 CFM at 100% VE, so it is actually probably closer to 40 CFM (@ 5000 rpm...)

But the flow isn't even (think sine wave)...... So the instantanous flow (or peak flow) will be higher so that on average it's 40cfm....

Follow this...........

1 cylinder needs 54 cfm at 5000 rpm.

Assume the intake stroke lasts 240 degrees.

So to average 54cfm during the 4-stroke cycle, the carb needs to flow (720/240) * 54cfm = 3 * 54cfm = 162cfm to average 54cfm.....

During that 240 degrees of intake flow, the flow isn't constant....

As an approximation, figure the flow rate is like a sine wave (think AC current, where the average is 120volts, but the peak is higher (1.4 times higher))

so

at peak flow you need a carb that can flow 162 * 1.4 = 227cfm.........

BTW, with the same 240 degrees intake duration, the 227cfm carb would work with 2 and 3 cylinders as there's no overlap during intake cycles.

BTW2, and the 227cfm carb would even work with 4,5,6 cylinders with 240 degrees duration because when 1 cylinder needs the 227cfm, other cylinders need 0cfm.

BTW3, a 6 cylinder would have constant flow of 227cfm

_________________
Ed
64 Valiant 225 / 904 / 42:1 manual steering / 9" drum brakes

8)


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 07, 2006 10:12 am 
Offline
EFI Slant 6
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 4:47 pm
Posts: 374
Location: SF CAL
Car Model:
so what your saying is a dual 1bbl setup that flowed 227 cfm out of each carb would meet the peak requirements for the motor.

or are you saying a 2bbl setup that flowed 227 cfm would have sufficient flow.

what are the carter bbs carbs rated at?

I'm starting to understand thanks emsvitil

_________________
64' Valiant Signet 5.9, 64' Dart 170 moredoor 3.7, 67' A100 3.7, 00' Dakota SLT 4.7
Image


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 07, 2006 2:40 pm 
Offline
Turbo Slant 6
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 02, 2006 12:16 am
Posts: 708
Location: Ooltewah, Tennessee
Car Model:
Quote:
so what your saying is a dual 1bbl setup that flowed 227 cfm out of each carb would meet the peak requirements for the motor.

or are you saying a 2bbl setup that flowed 227 cfm would have sufficient flow.

what are the carter bbs carbs rated at?

I'm starting to understand thanks emsvitil
I think he's saying dual singles that could deliver "113.5" each would get the job done.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 07, 2006 3:30 pm 
Offline
Supercharged

Joined: Thu May 12, 2005 11:50 pm
Posts: 6291
Location: So California
Car Model: 64 Plymouth Valiant
Quote:
Quote:
so what your saying is a dual 1bbl setup that flowed 227 cfm out of each carb would meet the peak requirements for the motor.

or are you saying a 2bbl setup that flowed 227 cfm would have sufficient flow.

what are the carter bbs carbs rated at?

I'm starting to understand thanks emsvitil
I think he's saying dual singles that could deliver "113.5" each would get the job done.

Nope......

At peak flow 1 cylinder needs 227cfm (with the above 5000rpm example).. On average 1 cylinder needs 54cfm, but flow isn't constant, so a carb rated at 54 would choke the engine.

I think a BBS is about 200-220cfm.


Any carb with 227cfm will meet the flow requirements on a single or split manifold (with 6 or less cylinders). The advantage of the 2bbl carb is that they flow more air, and there's less restriction to the flow getting into the engine. Less restriction, better volumetric efficiency, more power.

_________________
Ed
64 Valiant 225 / 904 / 42:1 manual steering / 9" drum brakes

8)


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 07, 2006 6:18 pm 
Offline
EFI Slant 6
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 4:47 pm
Posts: 374
Location: SF CAL
Car Model:
Last question I promise. Is their any real advantage to go with 2 1bbl's over a single 1bbl? Besides the fact that they look cool and would be easier to install on my 64' then a 2bbl.

_________________
64' Valiant Signet 5.9, 64' Dart 170 moredoor 3.7, 67' A100 3.7, 00' Dakota SLT 4.7
Image


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 07, 2006 6:25 pm 
Offline
Board Sponsor & Contributor

Joined: Thu Oct 31, 2002 5:39 pm
Posts: 24805
Location: North America
Car Model:
Don't forget that the twin-carb manifolds have balance pipes such that they are not truly "split".

_________________
一期一会
Too many people who were born on third base actually believe they've hit a triple.

Image


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 07, 2006 7:12 pm 
Offline
Turbo Slant 6
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 02, 2006 12:16 am
Posts: 708
Location: Ooltewah, Tennessee
Car Model:
Quote:
Last question I promise. Is their any real advantage to go with 2 1bbl's over a single 1bbl? Besides the fact that they look cool and would be easier to install on my 64' then a 2bbl.
Look cool? Here's an idea :!: Get 3 carbs and put 2 of them on believable mockup manifolds - one on each side of the real one. :!: :!:

If I could find some really cheap (read plastic) carb stacks I'd put 6 of them on a mockup just to see the first look on a couple faces when I pop the hood. :lol:


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 07, 2006 7:40 pm 
Offline
Board Sponsor & Contributor

Joined: Thu Oct 31, 2002 5:39 pm
Posts: 24805
Location: North America
Car Model:
Quote:
I'd put 6 of them on a mockup just to see the first look on a couple faces when I pop the hood. :lol:
Been done

_________________
一期一会
Too many people who were born on third base actually believe they've hit a triple.

Image


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 29 posts ]  Go to page Previous 1 2

All times are UTC-08:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited