Slant *        6        Forum
Home Home Home
The Place to Go for Slant Six Info!
Click here to help support the Slant Six Forum!
It is currently Sun Nov 02, 2025 2:52 am

All times are UTC-08:00




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Turbo Base Tune
PostPosted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 8:46 pm 
Offline
TBI Slant 6

Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2012 10:37 pm
Posts: 219
Location: Hamilton, ON, Canada
Car Model:
I'm picking up a rebuilt slant this week, I'll be running a blow through Holley 2300 500cfm on a super six manifold, aussie permaseal head gasket, stock exhaust manifold to j-pipe to a hx35, intercooled. Couple questions....

1. Will the 500cfm be too much? Should I use a 350 cfm one? Hoping for around 12 psi.

2. What should the timing be set at for first start?

3. What jet size should I run off the start, and should I even drill out the power valve at all with that little boost? If so, how much?

Thanks for all the help you guys have been giving me, hoping to have the car down the track a couple times this year. Should be pretty quick.

-Ryan

_________________
1965 Plymouth Belvedere II Turbo Project - SOLD
2002 Subaru OBS
1995 Lexus LS400 Race Car


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 10:47 pm 
Offline
Turbo Slant 6
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 10:21 pm
Posts: 527
Car Model:
1. "Will the 500cfm be too much? Should I use a 350 cfm one? Hoping for around 12 psi."

In my opinion, I'd go with the 350 just to keep flow velocities up, through the carburetor. Might make it easier to tune...

2. "What should the timing be set at for first start?"

The timing on our engine is locked in at 18 degrees before TDC, with no centrifugal advance mechanism and no vacuum canister. It runs great tuned like that, but we drive it very little on the street. Perhaps a vacuum advance unit would garner us better gas mileage (and maybe a cooler-running engine, but ours never climbs above 180), but for a new engine just starting up, I think our system is simple and effective, Our distributor is a Lean Burn unit that is completely devoid of advance mechanisms of any kind, and the engine doesn't seem to miss 'em at all; starts on the first click of the key and never kicks back on the starter...

3. "What jet size should I run off the start, and should I even drill out the power valve at all with that little boost? If so, how much?"

Get yourself a wideband A/F ratio meter and tune the carb for an A/F ratio of about 11.5:1 under boost and 13:1 for cruise. I am not saying it is actually impossible to tune a forced induction carb without a meter like that, but I just can't imagine even trying it.

When you buy it, ask them about the effects of leaded gas on the O2 sensor. i ruined ours with av gas and had to replace it; got to where it wouldn't work at all.

Twelve pounds of boost is enough to THOROUGHLY wake up a slant six, beiieve me! you will be astounded at your new-found power... I sure was at ten pounds!!!

Insofar as a cam goes, for a project like this one I'd think that the most practical thing to do would be to obtain, one way or another, a set of 1.6:1 (high-lift) rocker arms and run them on the stock cam. Over on FABO, there is a thread that shows some Buick Straight-Eight 1.6:1 rockers that are touted as fitting a slant six with minimal work done to them.

I made a set (of 1.6:1 rockers) by modifying some stock rockers, and it wasn't very hard to do. Tom Wolfe showed me how.

If you'll send me your email address, I'll fill you in on all the details regarding the process. Send a blank email to Billdedman@Hotmail.com. I'll deliver the details.

Good luck with your project!!!
Bill, in Conway, Arkansas

_________________
1964 Valiant 4-door sedan, 225 turbo/904


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 8:19 am 
Offline
SL6 Racer & Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 19, 2002 12:06 pm
Posts: 8967
Location: Silver Springs, Fl.
Car Model:
Quote:
1. "Will the 500cfm be too much? Should I use a 350 cfm one? Hoping for around 12 psi."

In my opinion, I'd go with the 350 just to keep flow velocities up, through the carburetor. Might make it easier to tune...
I don't agree. Don't forget a 2bbl card is not rated at the same pressure drop as a 4 bbl. A 500cfm 2bbl is not the same flow as a 500 4 bbl. A 500 2bbl is only about 354 cfm when compared to a 4 bbl.

_________________
Charrlie_S
65 Valiant 100 2dr post 170 turbo
66 Valiant Signet 170 nitrous
64 Valiant Signet
64 Valiant 4dr 170
64 Valiant 4dr 225


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 11:24 am 
Offline
Turbo Slant 6
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 10:21 pm
Posts: 527
Car Model:
That's right; I totally forgot about that stupid "schizophrenic" flow rating system Holley uses for the 2bbl/4bbl comparison. I've never understood the rationale behind that.

Charrlie is right, I think, after considering the situation regarding the dual rating system. He usually is... :)

Bill in Conway, Arkansas

_________________
1964 Valiant 4-door sedan, 225 turbo/904


Top
   
 Post subject: Not totally holley..
PostPosted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:29 pm 
Offline
Board Sponsor
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2002 8:27 pm
Posts: 9714
Location: Salem, OR
Car Model:
Quote:
I totally forgot about that stupid "schizophrenic" flow rating system Holley uses for the 2bbl/4bbl comparison.
Holley isn't the only manufacturer that did the dual scale. Mostly it's because the scale on the pressure drop on bigger carbs won't hold up 100% against a 1 barrel or small 2 barrel on a max flow test (the smaller restrictive carbs on a test engine may not drop to the 0"hg limit (since most carb companies derive from a chevy 350-putting a Carter BBS on one would probably keep about 6" hg at WOT due to the restriction of the small venturi), but a 600 cfm AFB most likely would show 0" at WOT.

One of the local performance shops (now closed due to economy after quite a few decades of family business), use to blueprint and test carbs and they always tested the carb (regardless of size) at 0.5"Hg, their "theory"was that during racing or hi-performance, the only real flow that matters is what the carb will flow close to WOT since the rating system for carbs even at 1.5"Hg is not even close to the position of the plates at WOT...also they felt that at that flow rating they could compare the flow values of various types of carbs more reliably and be able to compare them without the "conversion" issue.

2 cents there.

On another note, for a mechanical governed distributor, I've researched and ended building 2 for board members for street use, Mechanical timing I kept conservative limiting out at 18 degrees- which means either running 0 initial and a 9 governor, or welding it up so you get some initial and a very short slot, depending on your method of delivery you may or may not be able to use vacuum advance, but there again I dialed a short advance can with a tight limit on the advance to be conservative.

-D.Idiot


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 5:35 pm 
Offline
TBI Slant 6

Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2012 10:37 pm
Posts: 219
Location: Hamilton, ON, Canada
Car Model:
So Charlie and D.I are saying I should use the 500? Does the 500 come on a car from the factory? I know some fords have the 350, but I don't even know what car that comes off of...

_________________
1965 Plymouth Belvedere II Turbo Project - SOLD
2002 Subaru OBS
1995 Lexus LS400 Race Car


Top
   
 Post subject: Are you..
PostPosted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 5:55 pm 
Offline
Board Sponsor
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2002 8:27 pm
Posts: 9714
Location: Salem, OR
Car Model:
The next real question is...are you going to hog out the super six holes?
The 350 cfm carb throttle bores/adaptor plate when compared to the BBD bores in the manifold need to be enlarged to make them even, the 500 has somewhat larger bores than the 350...although the turbo is going to push the mix right on through I can't see a "shelf" between the adapter and manifold being a good thing for flow.

The 500 would get the most flow out of the 2 barrels, but you might get better signal and metering out of a smaller 4 barrel...before you get all hands on I'd suggest getting a Holley book that shows the mods for boost so you have a reference (there will be some drilling involved, and depending on the year or part number your 500 was made, you may not have the correct passages to do the mod (if it's a modern 4412, you're in better shape). I think Holley also used to recommend a mod for the throttle shaft bores since a blow through can push air and fuel out the ends of the shaft, I think they used to use a drilled plate under the carb to divert the fuel...

I can't recommend a jet size, someone more experienced in that lineup will make that call, I do have lots of experience with Holley's and will say you need to get a book and read, then line up the parts for the mods, and it can go faster if you score a second carb of the same type to swap as you make changes.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 10, 2013 3:44 pm 
Offline
TBI Slant 6

Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2012 10:37 pm
Posts: 219
Location: Hamilton, ON, Canada
Car Model:
Yes, I'm going to open up the holes more. But, I have decided to only use the 350 for now. This engine is going to be my beginner one, so I'm going to make it simple, and build a forged low comp engine on the side. I'll end up tossing my little brother this engine in a year or so anyways.

_________________
1965 Plymouth Belvedere II Turbo Project - SOLD
2002 Subaru OBS
1995 Lexus LS400 Race Car


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 12, 2013 7:39 am 
Offline
Turbo Slant 6

Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2005 5:31 am
Posts: 969
Location: Norway
Car Model:
I have no clue about this, but I would say you can stuff a lot of air thru a 350 under pressure, and if it makes it easier to tune.....

_________________
I have no idea what I am talking about.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 12, 2013 8:44 am 
Offline
EFI Slant 6
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2010 5:07 pm
Posts: 277
Car Model:
6.5 pv
72 to 78 main jet
6 to 7 psi on fuel pressure but remember fuel pressure has a direct affect on air to fuel ratio
I'd start with a gap of about..28 on your plugs and adjust according
About 18° on your base timing

Just my opinion
Aaron

_________________
http://youtu.be/2Y4i4UOLiSA

http://www.forabodiesonly.com/mopar/sho ... p?t=126611


Top
   
PostPosted: Fri Jul 12, 2013 9:40 am 
Offline
Turbo Slant 6
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 10:21 pm
Posts: 527
Car Model:
Aaron, your comment about fuel pressure having a direct affect on the A/F ratio was puzzling to me. Within the confines of the needle and seat's area of its ability to control the opening and closing of the orifice, the float level should remain the same, even at varying pressures, shouldn't it?

If that's true, then the float level wouldn't change even though the incoming pressure varied, as long as it were still within the design parameters of the needle and seat's ability to do its job, i.e., not become overpowered and letting in more fuel than was called or, thereby raising the float level. That would manifest itself in a situation wherein it would be possible to change the incoming regulated pressure from, say, five to seven pounds without altering the float level (and the A/F ratio) at all, wouldn't it?

What am I missing here?

Bill

_________________
1964 Valiant 4-door sedan, 225 turbo/904


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 16, 2013 6:59 pm 
Offline
EFI Slant 6
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2010 5:07 pm
Posts: 277
Car Model:
Bill

We know that the fuel pressure must raise 1:1 with boost or for every psi of boost the fuel pressure needs to increase which should be handled by the fuel pressure regulator. And that statement was made with regards if the fuel pressure doesn't rise when one is in a boosted situation the motor will run lean!

I've also found that for whatever reason when I set my rear float I must set it just under were fuel trickles out the sight plug and the fuel pressure needs to be set at 6 psi if I try and set it where fuel trickles out the sight and at 7psi, fuel will come out the vent tube.

I hope this helps explains my statement
Aaron

_________________
http://youtu.be/2Y4i4UOLiSA

http://www.forabodiesonly.com/mopar/sho ... p?t=126611


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 17, 2013 6:35 am 
Offline
Board Sponsor & Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2002 11:08 am
Posts: 17178
Location: Blacksburg, VA
Car Model:
I would use the 500, partly for flow, and partly because it has the big 50cc accel pump.

Lou

_________________
Home of Slant6-powered fun machines since 1988


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 18, 2013 12:07 am 
Offline
Turbo Slant 6
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 10:21 pm
Posts: 527
Car Model:
Quote:
Bill

We know that the fuel pressure must raise 1:1 with boost or for every psi of boost the fuel pressure needs to increase which should be handled by the fuel pressure regulator. And that statement was made with regards if the fuel pressure doesn't rise when one is in a boosted situation the motor will run lean!

I've also found that for whatever reason when I set my rear float I must set it just under were fuel trickles out the sight plug and the fuel pressure needs to be set at 6 psi if I try and set it where fuel trickles out the sight and at 7psi, fuel will come out the vent tube.

I hope this helps explains my statement
Aaron
Aaron,

What I had issue with was the statement "6 to 7 psi on fuel pressure but remember fuel pressure has a direct affect on air to fuel ratio"
you made in a previous post.

I am sure we are on the same page here, but if we talk boost-referenced carburetors, we have to assume that if the boost is, say, 10 pounds, then the fuel pressure must also rise 10 pounds, or the air pressure in the carb will be pushing gas backward into the line.

So, the raised fuel pressure (orginating from the boost-referenced regulator,) must increase an amount equal to the boost pressure. Now, we have hopefully, the same air/fuel ratio we had with NO boost, because the increased fuel pressure has exactly offset the boost pressure it's having to act against.

I think you and I were saying the same thing, just using different words.

Thanks!

Bill

_________________
1964 Valiant 4-door sedan, 225 turbo/904


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ] 

All times are UTC-08:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited