Slant *        6        Forum
Home Home Home
The Place to Go for Slant Six Info!
Click here to help support the Slant Six Forum!
It is currently Sat Apr 05, 2025 8:11 am

All times are UTC-07:00




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Nov 12, 2015 4:48 pm 
Offline
4 BBL ''Hyper-Pak''

Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 8:54 pm
Posts: 40
Car Model: 1965 Valiant 200 Convertible Super 6 with A/C
Hello All,

After replacing the strut rod bushings (For the third time) I'm having an issue with uneven tension on the torsion bars.

The passenger side torsion adjuster bolt has 7-10 more complete turns (360 degrees)than the drivers side adjusting bolt.

In other words the torsion bar on the passenger side has way more tension on the adjuster than the driver side adjuster

I can get the right and left side even with each other, the only issue is above.

Which I believe is not correct


Thanks for the help in advance


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 13, 2015 1:06 pm 
Offline
Supercharged
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 1:25 pm
Posts: 5611
Location: Downeast Maine
Car Model:
Are you using the old stile bushing that looks like this or the two piece hockey puck stile which may only fit 1966 - 74?

At any rate, the nut that secures the end of strut rod at radiator suport is to be torqued to 40 lb-ft.; this what my 1967 FSM calls for using the non puck stile bushing, and I suspect the same is true for the pucks. (I now have the pucks installed on my 67, and found them able to better control position of lower control arm {caster setting}; these were standard on B Body and other cars, and now are sold for A Body's as an upgrade or HD part)

It is not unreasonable to find that both lower control arms can be different distances (fractions of an inch) from where the front bushing and nut secure the assembly to front of car. So once torqued there is going to be un equal amount of thread showing. The force applied, that is to say the drawing of rod forward, is the critical setting; 40 lb.ft.

_________________
67' Dart GT Convertible; the old Chrysler Corp.
82' LeBaron Convertible; the new Chrysler Corp
07' 300 C AWD; Now by Fiat, the old new Chrysler LLC

Image


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 13, 2015 2:19 pm 
Offline
Board Sponsor & Contributor

Joined: Thu Oct 31, 2002 5:39 pm
Posts: 24533
Location: North America
Car Model:
Assuming the torsion bars are original to the car, they're half a century old, and the driver's and passenger's side bars don't have the same amount of stress on them.

Assuming the torsion bars are not original to the car, who knows what got put in, where they came from, and how many miles they had on them before they were put in your car.

Disregarding the torsion bars altogether, your car is half a century old. Stuff fatigues. Stuff wears out. Stuff bends. Stuff gets hit and not quite put back all the way it was.

_________________
一期一会
Too many people who were born on third base actually believe they've hit a triple.

Image


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 13, 2015 4:20 pm 
Offline
4 BBL ''Hyper-Pak''

Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 8:54 pm
Posts: 40
Car Model: 1965 Valiant 200 Convertible Super 6 with A/C
I'm using the Moog hockey puck style bushings.

The last ones where energy suspension bushings. They didn't last very long

The ones before that where the OEM style rubber one piece bushings referenced in the comments above.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 13, 2015 7:03 pm 
Offline
Board Sponsor & Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2002 7:27 pm
Posts: 14639
Location: Park Forest, Illinoisy
Car Model: 68 Valiant
Have you checked the lower A arm bushings? I bet they are shot and that is what is killing your strut rod bushings.

_________________
Official Cookie and Mater Tormentor.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 13, 2015 7:18 pm 
Offline
4 BBL ''Hyper-Pak''

Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 8:54 pm
Posts: 40
Car Model: 1965 Valiant 200 Convertible Super 6 with A/C
The lower control arm bushings where replaced four years ago (Less than 1000 miles)when I installed the energy suspension bushings.

My question is about uneven torsion bar tension. not strut rod bushings

Thanks


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 13, 2015 7:33 pm 
Offline
Guru
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2002 11:22 am
Posts: 3740
Location: Sonoma, Calif.
Car Model: Many Darts and a Dacuda
I would not worry about it if you can get the correct ride height and the vehicle does not feel "uneven" in spring rate... when cornering.

A torsion bar swap is not that hard... if you have the correct tools so keep your eye out of a replacement set of T bars... hopefully a set with a higher spring rate.
DD


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 13, 2015 10:58 pm 
Offline
Board Sponsor & Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2002 7:27 pm
Posts: 14639
Location: Park Forest, Illinoisy
Car Model: 68 Valiant
Has your adjuster been off since you replaced the control arm bushings? Is the adjuster simply clocked wrong?

_________________
Official Cookie and Mater Tormentor.


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 14, 2015 6:44 am 
Offline
Supercharged
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 1:25 pm
Posts: 5611
Location: Downeast Maine
Car Model:
DD:
Quote:
I would not worry about it if you can get the correct ride height and the vehicle does not feel "uneven" in spring rate...
True if both bars are of same nominal dimension such as six cyl or V8 bar as some folks like to call them, handling dynamics won't be too far out of balance side to side.

However when I got my Dart in '08 turning right was a sloppy flopping keel over sensation, where a left turn was much more controlled. I pondered this for a few months as the bugs were worked out of the car after sitting for years, then one day for some unknown impulse, I had to mic the diameters of both bars. Left side was a 6 cyl bar and right a thicker V8 bar so car's suspension would travel more when smaller bar was loaded than the other stiffer side.

Or, one of your bars is a correct size or spring rate, but miss-matched from someone replacing only one side for whatever reason. In other words say one of the bars came from a low mileage car, and the other bar is a high mileage part. The high mileage part will be more fatigued, or now has less spring rating than its mate. Springs lose their stiffness, or ability to rebound with same force when first manufactured over time and cycles to failure (flexing enough times until it fails).

Measure your bars at their mid point, compare diameters just to be nerdly, and plan on replacing those used up half century old bars with something a little stiffer than what factory installed.

I installed 0.940" bars from Firm Feel (one of many bar supliers), also a anti sway bar, new rear springs, all new bushings, and now the car handles like a modern car.

Also while you have all that apart a little rebuild of LCA might help stiffen things up, view here, one place to get stiffening plates here.

_________________
67' Dart GT Convertible; the old Chrysler Corp.
82' LeBaron Convertible; the new Chrysler Corp
07' 300 C AWD; Now by Fiat, the old new Chrysler LLC

Image


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 14, 2015 9:08 am 
Offline
4 BBL ''Hyper-Pak''

Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 8:54 pm
Posts: 40
Car Model: 1965 Valiant 200 Convertible Super 6 with A/C
I spent about a half hour trying to "time" different positions of the torsion bar in the LCA. It made no difference.

The torsion bars are probably worn out and will need to be replaced as well as all of the ball joints. There are a lot of them (ball joints) compared with a modern car)


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 15, 2015 6:25 am 
Offline
Supercharged
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 1:25 pm
Posts: 5611
Location: Downeast Maine
Car Model:
Quote:
There are a lot of them (ball joints) compared with a modern car)
Two uppers, and two lower ball joints just like both my 2007 Chrysler 300C AWD & Mrs. wjajr's 2007 Nitro.

_________________
67' Dart GT Convertible; the old Chrysler Corp.
82' LeBaron Convertible; the new Chrysler Corp
07' 300 C AWD; Now by Fiat, the old new Chrysler LLC

Image


Top
   
 Post subject: old stuff
PostPosted: Sun Nov 15, 2015 6:39 pm 
Offline
Turbo EFI
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2011 11:07 am
Posts: 2132
Location: SF Bay Area
Car Model: 67 dart 2 door hardtop
I agree with Dan and DD, these cars are really old, it may well be that one bar took way more stress over the years, and thus it might be perfectly "normal" for one adjuster needing to be cranked further than the other to get it level.

If you have it level and it is handling well, aligned well, I'd say you've got a good situation.

Brian

_________________
https://tinyurl.com/yynpj4v2


Top
   
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:12 pm 
Offline
Turbo Slant 6

Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2003 11:47 am
Posts: 539
Location: Illinois
Car Model:
Quote:
Quote:
There are a lot of them (ball joints) compared with a modern car)
Two uppers, and two lower ball joints just like both my 2007 Chrysler 300C AWD & Mrs. wjajr's 2007 Nitro.
I remember the chrysler LX cars having 2 lower ball joints per side in the front and 1 upper ball joint.

Some modern cars have 4 or 5 ball joints per corner. Only mcpherson strut cars generally have only 1 ball joint.


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 

All times are UTC-07:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited